JNM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH RSS TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


First published online February 20, 2008, 10.2967/jnumed.107.047092
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in JNM
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bradbury, M. S.
Right arrow Articles by Holland, E. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bradbury, M. S.
Right arrow Articles by Holland, E. C.

Dynamic Small-Animal PET Imaging of Tumor Proliferation with 3'-Deoxy-3'-18F-Fluorothymidine in a Genetically Engineered Mouse Model of High-Grade Gliomas

Michelle S. Bradbury1, Dolores Hambardzumyan2, Pat B. Zanzonico3, Jazmin Schwartz3, Shangde Cai4, Eva M. Burnazi4, Valerie Longo5, Steven M. Larson1 and Eric C. Holland2,6

1 Department of Radiology, Sloan Kettering Institute for Cancer Research, New York, New York; 2 Cancer Biology and Genetics, Sloan Kettering Institute for Cancer Research, New York, New York; 3 Department of Medical Physics, Sloan Kettering Institute for Cancer Research, New York, New York; 4 Cyclotron and Radiochemistry Core, Sloan Kettering Institute for Cancer Research, New York, New York; 5 Small-Animal Imaging Core Facility, Sloan Kettering Institute for Cancer Research, New York, New York; and 6 Neurosurgery Service, Sloan Kettering Institute for Cancer Research, New York, New York


Figure 1
View larger version (7K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIGURE 1.  Three-compartment, 4-parameter model of 18F-FLT kinetics. 18F-FLT is transported from vascular space (1) into tissue, comprising exchangeable compartment (2) and metabolically trapped (i.e., phosphorylated) compartment (3). Four rate constants describe transfer among these compartments. CpFLT = concentration of 18F-FLT in arterial plasma; Ct,eFLT = concentration of 18F-FLT in exchangeable compartment; Ct,mFLT = concentration of phosphorylated (i.e., trapped) 18F-FLT.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIGURE 2.  Transverse PET images of 18F-FLT uptake in non–tumor-bearing (control) (A) and tumor-bearing (B) mouse brains 60 min (i.e., 59–60 min) after intravenous injection. Intense accumulation of radiotracer was seen in GEM high-grade glioma model at level of maximum activity, with no appreciable intracranial uptake being seen in absence of tumor. Mean %ID/g values are indicated.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIGURE 3.  Static and dynamic measurements of 18F-FLT uptake in tumor and control mice in terms of %ID/g (mean ± SD) (A), kinetic parameters (B), and correlations between %ID/g and retention rate constant, k3 (C), and metabolic flux, KFLT (D). Double asterisks in A indicate statistically significant difference in comparison with results for control mice (P < 0.0004). Asterisks in B indicate mean parameter values of less than 10–5 and therefore essentially zero. Significantly higher values for %ID/g and all parameters, except for K1, were observed in tumors compared with control mouse brains, and good correlations were observed between k3 or KFLT and %ID/g. {dagger}Rate constants are expressed in mL/min/g; remaining rate constants are in units of min–1.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIGURE 4.  Transverse 18F-FLT PET images (A–C) and fitted time–activity curves (D and E) corresponding to representative control (A, mouse 1) and tumor-bearing (C, mouse 10) mice. Tumor-bearing mice (B and C) were selected on basis of minimum (B) and maximum (C) mean %ID/g values for groups of mice studied; latter values were compared with mean %ID/g for control mouse (A). Corresponding time–activity data were kinetically analyzed by compartmental modeling (D and E); fitted time–activity data are represented by solid or dashed curves, and measured time–activity data are represented by data points.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH RSS TABLE OF CONTENTS
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Copyright © 2008 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine.