JNM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH RSS TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

First published online December 12, 2007, 10.2967/jnumed.107.044545
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in JNM
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Coez, A.
Right arrow Articles by Sterkers, O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Coez, A.
Right arrow Articles by Sterkers, O.

Cochlear Implant Benefits in Deafness Rehabilitation: PET Study of Temporal Voice Activations

Arnaud Coez1–4,, Monica Zilbovicius1,2, Evelyne Ferrary5–7,, Didier Bouccara5–7,, Isabelle Mosnier5–7,, Emmanuèle Ambert-Dahan6, Eric Bizaguet3, André Syrota2, Yves Samson2,8,9 and Olivier Sterkers5–7,10

1 CEA-INSERM U797 Research Unit Neuroimaging and Psychiatry, Service Hospitalier Frédéric-Joliot, IFR49, Orsay, France; 2 CEA, DRM, DSV, Service Hospitalier Frédéric-Joliot, Orsay, France; 3 Laboratoire de correction Auditive, Eric Bizaguet, Paris, France; 4 Université Paris-Sud 11, Paris, France; 5 Inserm, Unit-M 867, Paris, France; 6 AP–HP, Hôpital Beaujon, Service d'ORL et de Chirurgie cervico-faciale, Clichy, France; 7 Institut Fédératif de Recherche Claude Bernard Physiologie et Pathologie, IFR02, Paris, France; 8 AP–HP, Hôpital Pitié-Salpétrière, Service Urgences cérébro-vasculaires, Paris, France; 9 Université Pierre et Marie Curie Paris 6, Paris, France; and 10 Université Denis Diderot-Paris 7, Paris, France


Figure 1
View larger version (66K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		FIGURE 1.  Intragroup contrasts. Location of activation peaks when listening to nonvoice compared with silence (A) and voice compared with nonvoice sound (B) in 3 groups (normal hearing and cochlear implanted patients) at P < 0.001 are shown in a lateral view of both hemispheres.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (62K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		FIGURE 2.  Intergroup contrasts. Location of differences of activation peaks between 3 groups (normal hearing and cochlear implanted patients) when listening to nonvoice compared with silence (A) and voice compared with nonvoice sounds (B) at P < 0.001 are shown in a lateral view of both hemispheres.

 




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH RSS TABLE OF CONTENTS
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Copyright © 2008 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine.