JNM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in JNM
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Merhige, M. E.
Right arrow Articles by Perna, A. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Merhige, M. E.
Right arrow Articles by Perna, A. F.

Impact of Myocardial Perfusion Imaging with PET and 82Rb on Downstream Invasive Procedure Utilization, Costs, and Outcomes in Coronary Disease Management

Michael E. Merhige1,2, William J. Breen{dagger},1,3, Victoria Shelton2, Teresa Houston3, Brian J. D'Arcy1,3 and Anthony F. Perna1

1 Departments of Cardiology, Internal Medicine, and Nuclear Medicine, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York; 2 Heart Center of Niagara, Niagara Falls, New York; and 3 Buffalo Cardiology and Pulmonary Associates, Buffalo, New York


Figure 1
View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIGURE 1.  Utilization rates of diagnostic coronary arteriography (Angio), PTCI, and CABG in patients studied with SPECT vs. PET MPI. REVASC = revascularization.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIGURE 2.  Clinical outcomes at average 1-y follow-up in patients studied with SPECT vs. PET MPI. NS = not statistically significant.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIGURE 3.  CAD management costs in patients studied with SPECT vs. PET MPI.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (58K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIGURE 4.  Examples of improved diagnostic reliability of PET vs. SPECT MPI in the same patients. (A) A 70-y-old man status post CABG with no history of MI. Exercise/rest SPECT images are normal but left ventricular ejection fraction was surprisingly reduced at 0.39. PET MPI within 2 wk discloses a clinically occult posterobasal MI. (B) A 53-y-old man with exertional left arm pain. SPECT images with dipyridamole stress are normal. PET MPI within 2 wk demonstrates a reversible inferoseptal perfusion defect. Ninety percent circumflex stenosis found on coronary arteriography. (C) A 46-y-old woman with chest pain. SPECT images are equivocal for reversible ischemia in inferolateral wall. PET images are normal. (D) A 59-y-old woman with chest pain. SPECT images are equivocal for reversible inferolateral ischemia as in C. PET images demonstrate reversible inferoseptal perfusion defect, treated with PTCI of 95% dominant right coronary artery stenosis.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Copyright © 2007 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine.