Impact of Myocardial Perfusion Imaging with PET and 82Rb on Downstream Invasive Procedure Utilization, Costs, and Outcomes in Coronary Disease Management
Michael E. Merhige1,2,
William J. Breen
,1,3,
Victoria Shelton2,
Teresa Houston3,
Brian J. D'Arcy1,3 and
Anthony F. Perna1
1 Departments of Cardiology, Internal Medicine, and Nuclear Medicine, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York; 2 Heart Center of Niagara, Niagara Falls, New York; and 3 Buffalo Cardiology and Pulmonary Associates, Buffalo, New York

View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIGURE 1. Utilization rates of diagnostic coronary arteriography (Angio), PTCI, and CABG in patients studied with SPECT vs. PET MPI. REVASC = revascularization.
|
|

View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIGURE 2. Clinical outcomes at average 1-y follow-up in patients studied with SPECT vs. PET MPI. NS = not statistically significant.
|
|

View larger version (58K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIGURE 4. Examples of improved diagnostic reliability of PET vs. SPECT MPI in the same patients. (A) A 70-y-old man status post CABG with no history of MI. Exercise/rest SPECT images are normal but left ventricular ejection fraction was surprisingly reduced at 0.39. PET MPI within 2 wk discloses a clinically occult posterobasal MI. (B) A 53-y-old man with exertional left arm pain. SPECT images with dipyridamole stress are normal. PET MPI within 2 wk demonstrates a reversible inferoseptal perfusion defect. Ninety percent circumflex stenosis found on coronary arteriography. (C) A 46-y-old woman with chest pain. SPECT images are equivocal for reversible ischemia in inferolateral wall. PET images are normal. (D) A 59-y-old woman with chest pain. SPECT images are equivocal for reversible inferolateral ischemia as in C. PET images demonstrate reversible inferoseptal perfusion defect, treated with PTCI of 95% dominant right coronary artery stenosis.
|
|
Copyright © 2007 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine.