JNM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH RSS TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


First published online June 15, 2007, 10.2967/jnumed.107.040436
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in JNM
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Louis, E.
Right arrow Articles by Hustinx, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Louis, E.
Right arrow Articles by Hustinx, R.

Noninvasive Assessment of Crohn's Disease Intestinal Lesions with 18F-FDG PET/CT

Edouard Louis1, Geoffrey Ancion2, Arnaud Colard1, Veronique Spote3, Jacques Belaiche1 and Roland Hustinx2

1 Department of Gastroenterology, CHU of Liège, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium; 2 Department of Nuclear Medicine, CHU of Liège, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium; and 3 Department of Medical Imaging, CHU of Liège, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium


Figure 1
View larger version (49K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIGURE 1.  From left to right, examples of PET, CT, PET/CT, and corresponding endoscopic appearance. (A) Deep ulcers with cobblestones in left colon, appearing as thickened segment with prominent increase of 18F-FDG uptake on PET/CT. (B) No endoscopic lesion in cecum, contrasting with thickening of bowel wall and increased uptake of FDG on PET/CT.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (7K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIGURE 2.  RSUV for each of 95 intestinal segments explored according to type of endoscopic lesion. RSUV (ratio of SUV in bowel segments over liver SUV) was significantly different in the 5 types of lesions (0 = no lesion; 1 = aphthoid ulcers, erythema, and pseudopolyps; 2 = superficial ulcers; 3 = deep ulcers and cobblestones; 4 = stricture). Bars indicate medians (median for type 0 lesion is 0) (P < 0.0001).

 

Figure 3
View larger version (8K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIGURE 3.  Receiver operating characteristic curve of RSUV for detection of severe endoscopic lesions (types 3 and 4: deep ulcers and strictures). We deliberately selected a threshold with maximum sensitivity to allow detection of the vast majority of severe lesions. In our dataset, a threshold of 1.47 of RSUV gave a sensitivity of 100% for detection of severe lesions and a specificity of 67.1% for detection of any endoscopic lesion.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH RSS TABLE OF CONTENTS
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Copyright © 2007 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine.