JNM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


First published online May 15, 2007, 10.2967/jnumed.106.036699
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in JNM
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zitzmann, S.
Right arrow Articles by Haberkorn, U.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zitzmann, S.
Right arrow Articles by Haberkorn, U.

Identification and Evaluation of a New Tumor Cell–Binding Peptide, FROP-1

Sabine Zitzmann1,2, Susanne Krämer2, Walter Mier2, Ulrike Hebling1,2, Annette Altmann1,2, Axel Rother4, Dietmar Berndorff5, Michael Eisenhut3 and Uwe Haberkorn1,2

1 Clinical Cooperation Unit Nuclear Medicine, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany; 2 Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; 3 Department of Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany; 4 Forschungszentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany; and 5 Bayer-Schering-Pharma Research Laboratories, Berlin, Germany


Figure 1
View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIGURE 1.  In vitro binding studies to various tumor cell lines—MCF-7, MDA-MB435, HeLaTeton, FRO82-2, FTC133, SW1736, PC-3, DU-145, HNO237, HNO97, HNO210, HNO223, CaCo-2, SW948, and HCT116—and to nontumor cell line HPV16-GM and primary endothelial cells HUVEC. Cells were incubated either with 125I-FROP-1 without competitor (–) or in presence of 10–4 M unlabeled FROP-1 (+) for 1 h at 37°C. Experiments were performed in triplicate; SDs are shown.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIGURE 2.  (A) Amino acid sequence of peptide FROP-1 isolated by peptide phage display. (B) In vitro binding assay with FROP-1. FRO82-2 and MCF-7 cells were grown for 24 h. 125I-FROP-1 was added to wells and incubated for 1 h; as competitor, either 1 x 10–4 M unlabeled FROP-1 or octreotide (Oct) was added immediately before incubation with labeled FROP-1. (C) Internalization of 125I-FROP-1 in MCF-7 cells. Cells were incubated with 1–2 x 106 cpm radioligand for 10 min and 1 h at 37°C. After being washed with acidic glycine buffer (pH 2.8), cells were lysed and internalized radioactivity was measured. Experiments were performed in triplicate; SDs are shown. 1W = first acidic wash, 2W = second acidic wash, L = lysate, C = control with unlabeled peptide; Comp. = competitor.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (7K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIGURE 3.  (A and B) In vitro binding kinetics of FROP-1. FRO82-2 and MCF-7 cells were grown for 24 h. 125I-FROP-1 was added and incubated for 5, 10, 15, 30, 60, 120, 180, and 240 min without (A) or with (B) 1% BSA. (C) In vitro competition assay with FROP-1 using various competitor concentrations. FRO82-2 and MCF-7 cells were grown for 24 h. Unlabeled FROP-1 in concentrations ranging from 10–4 M to 10–7 M were added to cells immediately before 125I-FROP-1 and incubated for 1 h. Experiments were performed in triplicate; SDs are shown.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIGURE 4.  HPLC analysis of 125I-FROP-1 in supernatant of FRO82-2 (A) and MCF-7 (B) cells at different time points. Final product of degradation is 125I-tyrosine in both cases (peak eluting at approximately 1.55 min).

 

Figure 5
View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIGURE 5.  Stability experiment: 125I-FROP-1 was incubated in human serum, and aliquots were removed after times ranging from 5 to 120 min and analyzed by HPLC.

 

Figure 6
View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIGURE 6.  Biodistribution of FROP-1 in female BALB/c nu/nu mice carrying FRO82-2 tumors (n = 3 animals per time point) (A) or MCF-7 tumors (n = 6 animals per time point) (B). Animals received intravenous injection of 131I-FROP-1, and radioactivity was measured in tumor and control organs after 5, 15, 45, and 135 min. SEM is shown. (C) Tumor-to-muscle ratios calculated for FRO82-2 and MCF-7 tumors at various time points. (D) Biodistribution of 125I-FROP-1 at 45 min comparing FRO82-2 and MCF-7 tumors incubated with and without Matrigel (BD Biosciences) (n = 3 animals per time point).

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Copyright © 2007 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine.