JNM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in JNM
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brepoels, L.
Right arrow Articles by De Wolf-Peeters, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Brepoels, L.
Right arrow Articles by De Wolf-Peeters, C.

Effect of Corticosteroids on 18F-FDG Uptake in Tumor Lesions After Chemotherapy

Lieselot Brepoels1,2, Sigrid Stroobants1,2, Peter Vandenberghe3, Karoline Spaepen1, Patrick Dupont1,2, Johan Nuyts1,2, Guy Bormans2,4, Luc Mortelmans1,2, Gregor Verhoef5 and Christiane De Wolf-Peeters6

1 Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Gasthuisberg and Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; 2 Molecular Small Animal Imaging Center, University Hospital Gasthuisberg and Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; 3 Center of Human Genetics, University Hospital Gasthuisberg and Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; 4 Laboratory for Radiopharmacy, University Hospital Gasthuisberg and Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; 5 Department of Hematology, University Hospital Gasthuisberg and Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; and 6 Department of Pathology, University Hospital Gasthuisberg and Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium


Figure 1
View larger version (8K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIGURE 1.  Evolution of viable tumor cells (A) and stromal mouse cells (B) as measured by flow cytometry in mice treated with chemotherapy ({blacksquare}, group A) and mice treated with chemotherapy and hydrocortisone ({square}, group B) and expressed as mean percentage ± SEM. x-axis: different time points (days after treatment); y-axis: percentage cell fraction out of total, as measured by flow cytometry. *Significant differences after Bonferroni correction between both treatment groups.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIGURE 2.  (A) Serial small-animal PET images in the same mouse on D0 (before chemotherapy) and on D+6, D+9, D+13, and D+16 after treatment. (B) Evolution in SUVmean, SUVmax, Volmetab, and TLG as measured by serial small-animal PET scanning in mice treated with chemotherapy ({blacksquare}, group A; n = 5) compared with mice treated with chemotherapy and hydrocortisone ({square}, group B; n = 5) and expressed as mean ± SEM. *Significant at P ≤ 0.05 level by unpaired Student t test.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (94K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIGURE 3.  Histopathologic sections on D0 (before treatment) and on D+9 after treatment after staining with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and immunostaining with anti-CD20 and Ki67. (A) Histology on D0 shows high density of CD20-positive tumor cells, with high proliferation rate. (B) D+9 in group A: diffuse stromal reaction of primarily mononuclear cells. (C) D+9 in group B: influx of primarily granulocytes.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIGURE 4.  Subdivision of inflammatory reaction in NK cells (NK1.1), granulocytes (Ly6G (Gr-1)), and macrophages (F4/80) as measured by flow cytometry and expressed as percentage of total stromal host cells over time (2 mice per time point) in group A (A) and group B (B).

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Copyright © 2007 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine.