JNM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Millet, P.
Right arrow Articles by Ibáñez, V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Millet, P.
Right arrow Articles by Ibáñez, V.

SPECT Quantification of Benzodiazepine Receptor Concentration Using a Dual-Ligand Approach

Philippe Millet1, Christophe Graf1, Marcelle Moulin2 and Vicente Ibáñez1

1 Psychiatric Neuroimaging Unit, Division of Neuropsychiatry, Department of Psychiatry, University Hospitals of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland; and 2 INSERM, E340, Grenoble, France


Figure 1
View larger version (20K):

[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 1.  Three-compartment model used to fit SPECT data. This model contains 2 components for labeled and unlabeled ligands with individual parameters for IMZ and FMZ. Compartments Cp*(t) and Cp(t) represent unchanged plasma 123I-IMZ and FMZ, respectively; Mf+ns(t) represents free and nonspecifically bound ligand, and Ms(t) represents specifically bound ligand. Parameters K1 and k'2 are associated with exchanges between plasma and free/nonspecifically bound ligand compartment. B'max represents concentration of receptors available for binding and is defined as the common parameter of the model; kon and koff are association and dissociation rate constants, respectively; and VR is volume of the reaction, which accounts for tissue inhomogeneity (26). Consequently, only the apparent equilibrium dissociation constant, KdVR, can be estimated. Kd is equilibrium dissociation constant, defined as the ratio of koff to kon. Parameter FV represents the fraction of blood present in tissue volume and was fixed at 0.04 (13,27,28).

 

Figure 2
View larger version (24K):

[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 2.  Time courses of 11C-FMZ and 123I-IMZ plasma components obtained from previous study for 7 healthy volunteers (14). Time courses of unchanged plasma levels of both tracers are linked by the following relationship: 11C-FMZ = (f1FMZ/f1IMZ) x (123I-IMZ/(0.72 e–0.08[t-6.3])), where f1FMZ = 0.5 and f1IMZ = 0. 33.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (30K):

[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 3.  Example with 1 volunteer of a coupled fit obtained among 8 ROIs placed on gray matter (1), whole brain (2), white matter (3), pons (4), occipital cortex (5), frontal cortex (6), temporal cortex (7), and cerebellum (8). Common parameters were estimated simultaneously, and resulting values were used as constants to simplify the model.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (31K):

[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 4.  Compartmental analysis allows simulation of time courses for each compartment: free/nonspecifically bound and specifically bound ligand for 123I-IMZ (A and B) and FMZ (C and D). The first column corresponds to protocol 1 and the second column corresponds to protocol 2. Only the labeled input function of the model is represented here. Estimated IMZ model parameters were as follows: for A and C, B'max = 53 ± 1 pmol/mL, K1 = 0.54 ± 0.01 min–1, k'2 = 0.19 ± 0.01 min–1, kon/VR = 0.071 ± 0.003 mL/pmol·min, koff = 0.18 ± 0.01 min–1; and for B and D, B'max = 44 ± 2 pmol/mL, K1 = 0.44 ± 0.01 min–1, k2 = 0.20 ± 0.01 min–1, kon/VR = 0.100 ± 0.003 mL/pmol·min, koff = 0.24 ± 0.01 min–1.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (11K):

[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 5.  (A) Comparison across regions and volunteers between distribution volume values estimated using 3-compartment model parameters (DVT) and 2-compartment model parameters (DVT''). Quasiidentity line was obtained between values. (B) Comparison between B'max values and their corresponding DVT'' values estimated with 2-compartment model.

 

Figure 6
View larger version (18K):

[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 6.  Direct comparison between B'max values obtained in same volunteer with PET multiinjection approach and with SPECT dual-ligand approach. Dashed line corresponds to identity line.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Copyright © 2006 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine.