JNM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH RSS TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in JNM
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zhao, S.
Right arrow Articles by Tamaki, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zhao, S.
Right arrow Articles by Tamaki, N.

Biologic Correlates of Intratumoral Heterogeneity in 18F-FDG Distribution with Regional Expression of Glucose Transporters and Hexokinase-II in Experimental Tumor

Songji Zhao, MD1,2, Yuji Kuge, PhD2, Takafumi Mochizuki, MD3, Toshiyuki Takahashi, MD4, Kunihiro Nakada, MD1, Masayuki Sato, BS1, Toshiki Takei, MD1 and Nagara Tamaki, MD1

1 Department of Nuclear Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan
2 Department of Tracer Kinetics, Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan
3 Department of Radiology, Nikko Memorial Hospital, Muroran, Japan
4 Department of Pathology, Hokkaido Gastroenterology Hospital, Sapporo, Japan



View larger version (98K):

[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 1. ROIs were placed on ARG image, to cover mainly central (CT) and peripheral (PT) regions of viable tumor tissues and necrotic/apoptotic (NA) regions, with reference to corresponding sections stained with HE. SM = surrounding muscle.

 


View larger version (35K):

[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 2. (A) Representative autoradiograph of 18F-FDG distribution. ARG image shows intratumoral heterogeneous 18F-FDG distribution. (B) Quantitative evaluation of intratumoral 18F-FDG distribution. 18F-FDG accumulation level in CT region was highest, which was 1.6 and 2.3 times higher than those in PT and NA regions, respectively (P < 0.001).

 


View larger version (104K):

[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 3. Staining with anti-Glut-1 (A and D), anti-Glut-3 (B and E), and anti-HK-II (C and F) antibodies in CT region (top) was more prominent than those in PT region (bottom) in KDH-8 tumor tissues, respectively (x400).

 


View larger version (29K):

[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 4. Expression levels of Glut-1, Glut-3, and HK-II were assessed by semiquantitative immunohistochemical grading performed by calculating the product of these scores (intensity x % positive). Histochemical scores of Glut-1, Glut-3, and HK-II were significantly higher in CT region than those in PT region (P < 0.001).

 


View larger version (134K):

[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 5. Positive staining of HIF-1{alpha} was clearly observed in CT region (x400).

 


View larger version (15K):

[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 6. Relationships between expression levels of Glut-1, Glut-3, and HK-II and intratumoral 18F-FDG accumulation in KDH-8 tumor tissues. Intratumoral 18F-FDG accumulation significantly correlated with expression levels of Glut-1, Glut-3, and HK-II (intensity x % positive). (A) Relationship between 18F-FDG accumulation and histochemical grading score for Glut-1. (B) Relationship between 18F-FDG accumulation and histochemical grading score for Glut-3. (C) Relationship between 18F-FDG accumulation and histochemical grading score for HK-II. {square}, CT region; {triangleup}, PT region.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH RSS TABLE OF CONTENTS
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Copyright © 2005 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine.