JNM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Beckers, C.
Right arrow Articles by Malaise, M. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Beckers, C.
Right arrow Articles by Malaise, M. G.

Assessment of Disease Activity in Rheumatoid Arthritis with 18F-FDG PET

Catherine Beckers, MD1, Clio Ribbens, MD, PhD2, Béatrice André, MD2, Stefaan Marcelis, MD3, Olivier Kaye, MD, PhD2, Luc Mathy, MD2, Marie-Joëlle Kaiser, MD2, Roland Hustinx, MD, PhD1, Jacqueline Foidart, MD, PhD1 and Michel G. Malaise, MD, PhD2

1 Division of Nuclear Medicine, Center for Cellular and Molecular Therapy, University Hospital of Liège, Liège, Belgium
2 Department of Rheumatology, Center for Cellular and Molecular Therapy, University Hospital of Liège, Liège, Belgium
3 Department of Bone and Joint Radiology, University Hospital of Liège, Liège, Belgium



View larger version (85K):

[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 1. 18F-FDG PET images of healthy control subject (A and B) and RA patient with active disease (C and D). (A) 3D projection image of normal tracer distribution in knee. (B) Normal distribution in hand and wrist. (C) Rheumatoid knee. (D) Rheumatoid hand and wrist.

 


View larger version (29K):

[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 2. Percentage of PET positivity of different joints studied. *P < 0.05 compared with PET positivity ({chi}2 test). In ankles and MTP-1 joints, cohorts were too small to allow valid statistical analysis. S+ = swollen joints; T+ = tender joints; US+ = joints with synovial thickness >= 1 mm.

 


View larger version (17K):

[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 3. SUVs (mean ± SD) in joints in which synovitis is observed (PET+) or not observed (PET–) by 18F-FDG PET analysis. *P < 0.05 compared with PET-positive joints.

 


View larger version (17K):

[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 4. PET positivity (A) and SUVs (mean ± SD) (B) in different types of joints studied as joints were not swollen, not tender, and also US negative (0; n = 43) or were positive for 1 (n = 41), 2 (n = 110), or 3 (n = 162) parameters studied. *P < 0.05 compared with PET-positive joints.

 


View larger version (10K):

[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 5. Percentage of PET-positive joints according to synovial thickness measured by US.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Copyright © 2004 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine.