JNM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Slomka, P. J.
Right arrow Articles by Germano, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Slomka, P. J.
Right arrow Articles by Germano, G.

Automatic Quantification of Myocardial Perfusion Stress–Rest Change: A New Measure of Ischemia

Piotr J. Slomka, PhD1,2, Hidetaka Nishina, MD1, Daniel S. Berman, MD1, Xingping Kang, MD1, John D. Friedman, MD1, Sean W. Hayes, MD1, Usaf E. Aladl, PhD2 and Guido Germano, PhD1

1 Departments of Imaging and Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center and UCLA School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California
2 Departments of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada



View larger version (24K):

[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 1. ISCH area under the ROC curve expressed as a function of the change threshold used in the calculation of ISCH. For reference, areas under the ROC curves obtained by visual analysis are shown as straight lines.

 


View larger version (20K):

[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 2. Comparison of the ROC curves for ISCH with SSS, QSSS, and stress extent measures for the prediction of 50% (A) and 70% (B) coronary artery stenosis.

 


View larger version (17K):

[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 3. Comparison of the ROC curves for ISCH with SDS and QSDS measures for the prediction of 50% (A) and 70% (B) coronary artery stenosis.

 


View larger version (48K):

[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 4. Short-axis (left) and vertical long-axis (right) slices in a typical patient with stress-induced ischemia and no infarct.

 


View larger version (47K):

[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 5. Visualization of the stress–rest change estimated to be 4.5% by ISCH: (A) 99mTc stress images with stress contours, (B) coregistered 201Tl REST images with stress contours, (C) change counts displayed within the contour (partial-volume effect causes some voxels to be partially outside the contour), and (D) fused display of normalized change counts with stress images.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Copyright © 2004 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine.