JNM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH RSS TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Palm, S.
Right arrow Articles by Sgouros, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Palm, S.
Right arrow Articles by Sgouros, G.

Pharmacokinetics and Biodistribution of 86Y-Trastuzumab for 90Y Dosimetry in an Ovarian Carcinoma Model: Correlative MicroPET and MRI

Stig Palm, PhD1, Richard M. Enmon, Jr., PhD1, Cornelia Matei, SB1, Katherine S. Kolbert, MS1, Su Xu, PhD1, Pat B. Zanzonico, PhD1, Ronald L. Finn, PhD1, Jason A. Koutcher, MD, PhD1, Steven M. Larson, MD2 and George Sgouros, PhD1,3

1 Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
2 Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
3 Department of Radiology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland



View larger version (111K):

[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 1. Dissected mouse. Arrow indicates location of small tumor nodules on spleen.

 


View larger version (177K):

[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 2. Longitudinal microPET coronal slice images of 86Y-trastuzumab (A), excess unlabeled trastuzumab (B), 86Y-trastuzumab on nontumor-bearing mice (C), 86Y-HuM195 (D), and free 86Y (E). Numbers in upper left corner of each panel indicate time after injection (in hours). Black arrows indicate mAb accumulation at confirmed tumor sites. White arrows indicate injection site.

 


View larger version (56K):

[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 3. (A) High-resolution transverse MR image slices, registered to corresponding microPET slices. Contours depicting outer periphery of mouse and also collection of tumor nodules near spleen are shown. (B) Two transverse MR slices, obtained on small-animal (4.7 T) scanner, are shown. Two slices are taken at different transaxial positions. Slice on left is through spleen (yellow contour), kidneys (blue), and tumor nodules (orange). Slice on right is posterior to left slice and depicts multiple small tumor nodules in mesentery.

 


View larger version (20K):

[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 4. (A) Time–activity curve over injection site. Relative activity concentrations were determined by drawing ROIs on microPET image sets. Data are corrected for acquisition time, physical decay, and background. Error bars represent SE. (B) Time–activity curves for blood (triangles) and tumor (squares). Open symbols represent relative activity concentration (e.g., pharmacokinetics) derived from repeated microPET imaging. Activity concentrations (%IA/g) in dissected tissue (solid symbols) were used to quantitate image-based relative concentrations. Error bars represent combined standard uncertainty. Lines show fits used for cumulated activity calculations.

 


View larger version (21K):

[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 5. Uptake in various tissues 6 d after intraperitoneal injection with 86Y-trastuzumab (86Y-Herceptin), excess unlabeled (cold) trastuzumab, and 86Y-HuM195. Mean values and SE are shown.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH RSS TABLE OF CONTENTS
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Copyright © 2003 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine.