Comparison of Immunoscintigraphy, Efficacy, and Toxicity of Conventional and Pretargeted Radioimmunotherapy in CD20-Expressing Human Lymphoma Xenografts
Krishnan Subbiah, PhD1,
Don K. Hamlin, BS2,
John M. Pagel, MD, PhD1,
D. Scott Wilbur, PhD2,
Damon L. Meyer, PhD3,
Don B. Axworthy, BS4,
Robert W. Mallett, PhD4,
Louis J. Theodore, PhD4,
Pat S. Stayton, PhD5 and
Oliver W. Press, MD, PhD1,3,6
1 Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington
2 Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
3 Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
4 NeoRx Corporation, Seattle, Washington
5 Department of Bioengineering, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
6 Department of Biological Structure, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington

View larger version (17K):
[in a new window]
|
Figure 2. Gamma-camera images of mice injected with 1.4 nmol of 131I-1F5-sAv at 24 h (just before CA injection) (A), 25 h (1 h after CA injection) (B), and 48 h (24 h after CA injection) (C). Images are shown at same camera intensity settings. CA was injected 24 h after 131I-1F5-sAv administration. Arrows indicate radioactivity in thyroid (Th), blood pool (B), and liver (L).
|
|

View larger version (28K):
[in a new window]
|
Figure 3. Gamma-camera images of Ramos xenograft-bearing athymic mice injected with either directly labeled 111In-1F5 antibody (A and C) or pretargeted with 1F5-sAv conjugate followed 24 h later by CA and then by 111In-DOTA-biotin (B and D). Images are shown at same camera intensity settings. Images of mice are shown 2 h after injection of radioactivity (A and B) and 24 h after injection of radioactivity (C and D). Arrows indicate radioactivity in tumor (T), blood pool (B), and urinary bladder (U).
|
|
Copyright © 2003 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine.