JNM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nehmeh, S. A.
Right arrow Articles by Humm, J. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nehmeh, S. A.
Right arrow Articles by Humm, J. L.

Correction for Oral Contrast Artifacts in CT Attenuation-Corrected PET Images Obtained by Combined PET/CT

Sadek A. Nehmeh, PhD1, Yusuf E. Erdi, DSc1, Hovanes Kalaigian, MS1, Katherine S. Kolbert, MS1, Tinsu Pan, PhD2, Henry Yeung, MD3, Olivia Squire, BA3, Arvind Sinha, MD3, Steve M. Larson, MD3 and John L. Humm, PhD1

1 Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
2 Applied Science Laboratory, General Electric Medical Systems, Waukesha, Wisconsin
3 Nuclear Medicine Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York



View larger version (15K):

[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 1. Drawing of transaxial cross-section of phantom 1, with 9 syringes fixed in Styrofoam (The Dow Chemical Co.) sheet and filled with BaSO4 contrast agent at concentrations of 0%–80% (represented by numbers in circles that represent syringes).

 


View larger version (20K):

[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 2. Transaxial CT image of phantom 2, with shell filled with 18F-FDG and containing simulated lesion inside bottle of BaSO4 contrast agent and human vertebra.

 


View larger version (13K):

[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 3. CT number in HU versus concentration of oral BaSO4 contrast agent. As concentration of BaSO4 increases, CT number reaches plateau at 3,071 HU because of maximum of 12 bits of allocated memory in CT.

 


View larger version (12K):

[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 4. Linear attenuation coefficients at PET energy of 511 keV as function of CT number of BaSO4 measured experimentally at different concentrations. Linear attenuation values calculated by Discovery LS algorithm ({blacklozenge}), optimized for human tissues, by transformation optimized for BaSO4 contrast agent ({blacktriangleup}), and by use of 68Ge rod sources (•) are shown.

 


View larger version (126K):

[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 5. Patient’s lesion as it appears in corresponding sagittal slices reconstructed with 68Ge rod source-based attenuation correction (A), CTAC (B), and CTAC with SCC (C). Lesion is marked by arrows in panels A and C; it was not possible to determine extent of lesion in panel B because of uptake of contrast agent in bowel.

 


View larger version (14K):

[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 6. Measured activity concentration, reconstructed with CTAC, as function of concentration of BaSO4 contrast agent ({blacklozenge}). Plateau is attained at high concentrations because of truncation of CT number. Readings measured with 68Ge rod source-based attenuation correction are shown for comparison ({blacksquare}).

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Copyright © 2003 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine.