JNM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hayes, S. W.
Right arrow Articles by Berman, D. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hayes, S. W.
Right arrow Articles by Berman, D. S.

Prognostic Implications of Combined Prone and Supine Acquisitions in Patients with Equivocal or Abnormal Supine Myocardial Perfusion SPECT

Sean W. Hayes, MD1,2, Andrea De Lorenzo, MD1, Rory Hachamovitch, MD, MSc3, Sanjay C. Dhar, MD2, Patrick Hsu, MD2, Ishac Cohen, PhD1, John D. Friedman, MD1,2,4, Xingping Kang, MD1 and Daniel S. Berman, MD1,2,4

1 Department of Imaging, Division of Nuclear Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
2 Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
3 Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, University of Southern California, School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California
4 Department of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California



View larger version (53K):

[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 1. Postexercise 99mTc-sestamibi MPS images of 83-y-old asymptomatic man. Perfusion defect is noted in inferior and inferoapical walls in poststress supine images. Poststress prone images are normal, demonstrating that apparent perfusion defect is secondary to soft-tissue attenuation. Normal wall motion was noted on gated SPECT.

 


View larger version (15K):

[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 2. Injection and acquisition protocol for prone and supine MPS study. *15 min for exercise, 1 h for no walk adenosine (adapted and reprinted with permission of (24)).

 


View larger version (21K):

[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 3. Risk-adjusted hard event rates in patients undergoing supine-only or prone and supine acquisition, according to MPS interpretation. P < 0.0001 across scan categories; P > 0.05 for comparisons between supine-only or prone and supine. Mod-sev = moderately to severely abnormal.

 


View larger version (22K):

[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 4. Risk-adjusted total event rates in patients undergoing supine-only or prone and supine acquisition, according to MPS interpretation. P < 0.0001 across scan categories; P > 0.05 for comparisons between supine-only or prone and supine. Mod-sev = moderately to severely abnormal.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Copyright © 2003 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine.