JNM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nuyts, J.
Right arrow Articles by Mortelmans, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nuyts, J.
Right arrow Articles by Mortelmans, L.

Reducing Loss of Image Quality Because of the Attenuation Artifact in Uncorrected PET Whole-Body Images

Johan Nuyts, PhD1, Sigrid Stroobants, MD1, Patrick Dupont, PhD1, Stefaan Vleugels, MSc1, Patrick Flamen, MD, PhD1 and Luc Mortelmans, MD, PhD1

1 Nuclear Medicine, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium



View larger version (36K):

[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 1. Radioactive ring in uniform attenuating disk. Dashed circle represents boundary of uniform attenuation. Bold circle represents radioactive ring. Because of attenuation, projection through center (thick arrow) contains fewer counts than do 2 tangential projections (2 thin arrows), although same activity is projected.

 


View larger version (18K):

[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 2. (A) Original activity distribution, with dotted circle indicating attenuating disk. (B) Reconstruction without attenuation correction from attenuated projections. (C) Profile through center of reconstruction image.

 


View larger version (67K):

[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 3. Tumor detection simulation experiment. (A) True image and regions (ROIs) used to compute object and background tracer uptake. (B) FBP reconstructions with (ATTCOR) and without (NO COR) attenuation correction. (C) MLEM with and without attenuation correction and NEG-ML without attenuation correction.

 


View larger version (111K):

[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 4. PET study of 10 bed positions, 4 mm per bed position, on ECAT 931 (CTI, Knoxville, TN/Siemens Medical Systems, Inc., Hoffman Estates, IL). (A) FBP reconstruction. (B) MLEM reconstruction. (C) NEG-ML reconstruction.

 


View larger version (116K):

[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 5. PET study of 7 bed positions, 5 mm per bed position, on ECAT HR+ (CTI, Knoxville, TN/Siemens Medical Systems, Inc., Hoffman Estates, IL). (A) MLEM reconstruction. (B) NEG-ML reconstruction. Four consecutive coronal slices are shown, from anterior toward posterior, and indicate normal findings.

 


View larger version (17K):

[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 6. Radioactive ring in uniform attenuating disk.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Copyright © 2002 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine.