Effect of Respiratory Gating on Quantifying PET Images of Lung Cancer
Sadek A. Nehmeh, PhD1,
Yusuf E. Erdi, DSc1,
Clifton C. Ling, PhD1,
Kenneth E. Rosenzweig, MD2,
Heiko Schoder, MD3,
Steve M. Larson, MD3,
Homer A. Macapinlac, MD4,
Olivia D. Squire, RN3 and
John L. Humm, PhD1
1 Department of Medical Physics, Nuclear Medicine Service, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
2 Department of Radiation Oncology, Nuclear Medicine Service, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
3 Department of Radiology, Nuclear Medicine Service, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
4 Department of Nuclear Medicine, The University of Texas, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas

View larger version (16K):
[in a new window]
|
FIGURE 3. Transaxial 18F-FDG PET image through 1 patients lesion in nongated mode (A) and corresponding image in gated mode acquired in first bin (B). (C) Planning target volume in nongated (light blue) and gated (pink) modes. Note that light blue extends under whole pink area. Gating, in this particular case, has mainly spared left lung tissues from high doses.
|
|

View larger version (50K):
[in a new window]
|
FIGURE 4. Comparison between lesion volumes in nongated and gated modes. Gating shows consistency in reducing apparent lesion volume.
|
|

View larger version (56K):
[in a new window]
|
FIGURE 5. Comparison between SUVmax in nongated and gated modes. Gating shows consistency in improving accuracy in SUVmax measurements.
|
|

View larger version (13K):
[in a new window]
|
FIGURE 6. Maximum TLG (TLGmax) measurements in gated mode show linear dependence on those measured in nongated mode because increase in SUVmax should result in reduction in lesion volume by same factor.
|
|

View larger version (35K):
[in a new window]
|
FIGURE 7. Maximum deviations of lesion centroids in x-, y-, and z-directions.
|
|
Copyright © 2002 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine.