HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH RSS TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Abstract Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Garcia, E. V. Articles by Ezquerra, N. F. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Garcia, E. V. Articles by Ezquerra, N. F.

Diagnostic Performance of an Expert System for the Interpretation of Myocardial Perfusion SPECT Studies

Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta; and Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia

View larger version (17K): [in a new window]   FIGURE 1. Accuracy curves showing agreement between PERFEX and nuclear medicine physicians. Curves show accuracy for PERFEX as a function of CF shift level, using clinical interpretation of myocardial perfusion SPECT studies by nuclear medicine physicians as gold standard. For this population, 0.10 shift level results in optimal accuracy for localizing disease to LAD and RCA vascular territories and 0.20 level for LCX territory.

View larger version (34K): [in a new window]   FIGURE 2. ROC curves showing agreement between PERFEX and nuclear medicine physicians. ROC curves are plotted for overall detection of CAD (A) and for localization to LAD (B), LCX (C), and RCA (D) vascular territories. Points shown on ROC curves are generated from different CF shift levels. Level corresponding to 0.15 CF shift level was deemed to be average optimal input certainty factor from comparison of accuracy at different levels (Fig. 1).

View larger version (35K): [in a new window]   FIGURE 3. ROC curves showing agreement between PERFEX and coronary angiography. ROC curves are plotted for overall detection of CAD (A) and for localization to LAD (B), LCX (C), and RCA (D) vascular territories. Points shown on ROC curves are generated from different CF shift levels. *Results obtained from nuclear medicine physicians using coronary angiography as gold standard.

View larger version (55K): [in a new window]   FIGURE 4. Detection and localization of CAD: PERFEX vs. nuclear medicine physicians. Bar graphs show sensitivity and specificity values for PERFEX and nuclear medicine physicians (expert) at 3 different CF shift levels using coronary angiography as gold standard. For 0.15 CF shift level, there are no statistically significant differences in 5 of 8 criteria tested and PERFEX provides statistically better results in 1 of 3 criteria for which there are differences.