JNM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Raylman, R. R.
Right arrow Articles by Bishop, H. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Raylman, R. R.
Right arrow Articles by Bishop, H. A.

Positron Emission Mammography–Guided Breast Biopsy

Raymond R. Raylman, Stan Majewski, Andrew G. Weisenberger, Vladimir Popov, Randy Wojcik, Brian Kross, Judith S. Schreiman and Harry A. Bishop

Center for Advanced Imaging, Department of Radiology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia; and Detector Group, Jefferson Laboratory, Newport News, Virginia



View larger version (92K):

[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 1. Stereotactic software user interface. Display windows show ±15° images of breast phantom. User marks center of fiducial marker with x and center of lesion with +.

 


View larger version (110K):

[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 2. Gelatin compressed-breast phantom containing 10-mm-diameter simulated lesion.

 


View larger version (118K):

[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 3. Experimental setup. Most notable sections of apparatus have been labeled: gelatin breast phantom (A), anthropomorphic torso phantom (B), 500-mL beaker simulating bladder (C), 20-cm-diameter flood phantom simulating brain (D), 2 PEM detector units (E), x-ray tube of breast biopsy apparatus (Lorad, Danbury, CT) (F), biopsy needle positioning unit (G), biopsy gun (H), and proximal compression plate (I).

 


View larger version (19K):

[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 4. Plots of calculated versus known positions of 18F point sources show results for x-coordinate (A), y-coordinate (B), and z-coordinate (C). Fits of each set of data to straight line are also shown.

 


View larger version (22K):

[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 5. Images of gelatin breast phantom. (A) X-ray mammogram of phantom acquired at 0°. (B) PEM image of phantom acquired at 0°. Dashed box delineates outline of field of view of x-ray mammography unit. Ramp filter window function with cutoff value of 14% of Nyquist frequency was applied to image. Object in lower portion of PEM image is fiducial marker. Size scales of x-ray mammogram and PEM image are same to show differences in field of view of the 2 imagers.

 


View larger version (10K):

[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 6. Image of biopsy needle tip (blue color scale) overlaid with filtered PEM image of breast phantom (red color scale) used to assess needle positioning before firing of biopsy gun. Ramp filter window function with cutoff value of 14% of Nyquist frequency was applied to image. Image was acquired at detector rotation angle of -15°.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Copyright © 2001 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine.