JNM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fueger, B. J.
Right arrow Articles by Virgolini, I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fueger, B. J.
Right arrow Articles by Virgolini, I.

Effects of Chemotherapeutic Agents on Expression of Somatostatin Receptors in Pancreatic Tumor Cells

Barbara J. Fueger, Gerhard Hamilton, Markus Raderer, Thomas Pangerl, Tatjana Traub, Peter Angelberger, Gerhard Baumgartner, Robert Dudczak and Irene Virgolini

Departments of Nuclear Medicine, Internal Medicine I, and Oncology, University of Vienna, Vienna; Ludwig Boltzmann Institute of Clinical Oncology and Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hospital Lainz, Vienna; and Department of Radiochemistry, Seibersdorf Research Center, Seibersdorf, Austria



View larger version (37K):

[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 1. (A) Relative intensities of chemoluminescence detection of SSTR1–SSTR5 after hybridization with respective cDNA clones for 4 pancreatic cancer cell lines (mean ± SEM; 3 experiments). Intensities obtained for SSTR1 and SSTR2 are not statistically different from SSTR-negative COS7 cells (not shown). (B) Results of binding experiments using DOTA-LAN determined as specific binding (femtomoles per million cells), number of sites per cell (x 104), and Kd (nmol/L) for high- and low-affinity sites (1 and 2), respectively, from 3 experiments (mean ± SD; determinations done in triplicate). Number of binding sites per cell is not statistically significant for BxPC-3, Panc-1, and ASPC-1 cells.

 


View larger version (48K):

[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 2. (A) Inhibitory effects of respective chemotherapeutic agents on BxPC-3 cells (% inhibition compared with medium controls; n = 3; mean ± SEM) and percentage of subG1 cells in same cultures (n = 3; mean ± SEM). (B) Alterations in cell cycle distributions in BxPC-3 cells in response to chemotherapeutic agents. Percentage of cells in G1/0 phase, G2M phase, and S phase were calculated from histograms of propidium iodide–stained cells (n = 3; mean ± SEM). con = control; gemca = gemcitabine (1 and 2 µg/mL); cisPt = cisplatin (2.5 and 5 µg/mL); cpt = camptothecin (1.5 and 3 µg/mL); mito = mitomycin C (0.1 and 0.2 µg/mL); doxo = doxorubicin (1 and 2 µg/mL).

 


View larger version (37K):

[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 3. Effects of chemotherapeutic agents on binding of DOTA-LAN and number of binding sites per cell for high- and low-affinity sites (1 and 2), respectively, in BxPC-3 cells (n = 3; mean ± SEM). gemca = gemcitabine (1 and 2 µg/mL); cisPt = cisplatin (2.5 and 5 µg/mL); cpt = camptothecin (1.5 and 3 µg/mL); mito = mitomycin C (0.1 and 0.2 µg/mL); doxo = doxorubicin (1 and 2 µg/mL).

 


View larger version (36K):

[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 4. Reexpression of SSTR in pancreatic cancer cells after pretreatment with gemcitabine at 1 µg/mL (gemca1) and further incubation for 4 d (reexp; n = 3; mean ± SEM). Low-affinity binding of ASPC-1 cell reexpression exceeds scale used here (636.5 ± 11.5 fmol/106 cells). con = control.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Copyright © 2001 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine.