JNM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nanasato, M.
Right arrow Articles by Saito, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nanasato, M.
Right arrow Articles by Saito, H.

Evaluation of Left Ventricular Function Using Electrocardiographically Gated Myocardial SPECT with 123I-Labeled Fatty Acid Analog

Mamoru Nanasato, Akitada Ando, Satoshi Isobe, Makoto Nonokawa, Haruo Hirayama, Naoya Tsuboi, Teruo Ito, Makoto Hirai, Mitsuhiro Yokota and Hidehiko Saito

Cardiovascular Center, Nagoya Daini Red Cross Hospital, Nagoya; and First Department of Internal Medicine and Department of Clinical Laboratory Medicine, Nagoya University School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan



View larger version (16K):

[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 1. Segmentation scheme used for regional assessment of defect scores and wall motion in SPECT.

 


View larger version (35K):

[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 2. End-diastolic (ED) and end-systolic (ES) images obtained from gated SPECT with 123I-BMIPP (BM) and 99mTc-tetrofosmin (TF) in patient with anterior myocardial infarction.

 


View larger version (42K):

[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 3. Comparison of LVEF (EF), LVEDV (EDV), and LVESV (ESV) obtained from gated SPECT with 123I-BMIPP (BM) and 99mTc-tetrofosmin (TF).

 


View larger version (41K):

[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 4. (Left) Linear regression analysis of total defect score (TDS) of gated SPECT with 123I-BMIPP (BM) and differences between both gated SPECT procedures on LVEF (EF), LVEDV (EDV), and LVESV (ESV). TF = 99mTc-tetrofosmin. (Right) Linear regression analysis of TDS of gated SPECT with 123I-BMIPP and differences between gated SPECT with 123I-BMIPP and LVG on EF, EDV, and ESV.

 


View larger version (44K):

[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 5. Comparison of LVEF (EF), LVEDV (EDV), and LVESV (ESV) obtained from gated SPECT with 123I-BMIPP (BM) and LVG.

 


View larger version (44K):

[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 6. Comparison of LVEF (EF), LVEDV (EDV), and LVESV (ESV) obtained from gated SPECT with 99mTc-tetrofosmin (TF) and LVG.

 


View larger version (25K):

[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 7. Linear regression analysis of LVEF (EF), LVEDV (EDV), and LVESV (ESV) on gated SPECT with 123I-BMIPP (BM) measured by 2 independent observers.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Copyright © 2001 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine.