HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Abstract Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Khalkhali, I. Articles by Haber, S. B. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Khalkhali, I. Articles by Haber, S. B.

Diagnostic Accuracy of ^99mTc-Sestamibi Breast Imaging: Multicenter Trial Results

Department of Radiology, Harbor UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, California; Department of Radiology, The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Galveston, Texas; Women's Imaging Center of Delaware, Newark, Delaware; Departments of Pathology, Radiology, and Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts; and DuPont Pharmaceuticals Company, Wilmington, Delaware, and North Billerica, Massachusetts

View larger version (43K): [in this window] [in a new window]   FIGURE 1. Diagnostic statistics for 99mTc-sestamibi breast imaging in patients with palpable abnormalities. PPV = positive predictive value; NPV = negative predictive value.

View larger version (43K): [in this window] [in a new window]   FIGURE 2. Diagnostic statistics for 99mTc-sestamibi breast imaging in patients with nonpalpable abnormalities. PPV = positive predictive value; NPV = negative predictive value.

View larger version (25K): [in this window] [in a new window]   FIGURE 3. Diagnostic statistics for 99mTc-sestamibi breast imaging and for mammography in patients with palpable abnormalities. PPV = positive predictive value; NPV = negative predictive value.