JNM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


The Journal of Nuclear Medicine Vol. 41 No. 10 1636-1641
© 2000 by Society of Nuclear Medicine
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nahmias, C.
Right arrow Articles by Chirakal, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Nahmias, C.
Right arrow Articles by Chirakal, R.

Equilibration of 6-[18F]Fluoro-L-m-Tyrosine Between Plasma and Erythrocytes

Claude Nahmias, Lindi M. Wahl, Shigeko Amano, Marie-Claude Asselin and Raman Chirakal

Theoretical Biology, Institute for Advanced Study, Princeton, New Jersey; Department of Physics and Astronomy, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario; and Department of Nuclear Medicine, McMaster University Medical Centre, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada


Figure 1
View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIGURE 1. Time course of measured R(t) for FmT (A, {diamond}) and FHPAA (B, {square}). Solid lines show best fit to these data by most appropriate model, as determined using F statistic. Most appropriate model for FmT data was determined to be 1-parameter compartmental model described by Equation 3; for FHPAA appropriate model was 2-parameter compartmental model (Eq. 5).

 

Figure 2
View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIGURE 2. Time course of R(t) for each of 4 tracers. Population mean values of best-fit parameters were used to calculate R(t) for FDG (dotted line), RIHSA (dotted-dashed line), FmT (solid line), and FHPAA (dashed line). Error bars show mean value ± 1 SD of Re for FDG, RIHSA, and FHPAA; Re is constrained to equal 1 by model used for FmT data. Re was not significantly different from 1 for FDG and not significantly different from 0 for RIHSA. Inset replots equilibration of FHPAA (dashed line), with population mean of metabolite fraction (dotted line) from in vivo FmT studies. Note different time scale.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Copyright © 2000 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine.