JNM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


The Journal of Nuclear Medicine Vol. 6 No. 4 231-251
© 1965 by Society of Nuclear Medicine
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Smith, E. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Smith, E. M.

Internal Dose Calculation for 99mTc

E. M. Smith, Sc.D.1,2,

New York

ABSTRACT

The total local energy deposited per distintegration, Eß for 99mTc is 14 kev per disintegration. The specific gamma-ray constant, {Gamma}, for 99mTc is 0.72 R-cm2/mc-hr; however, 29 per cent of this value is due to K{alpha} and Kß x-rays which make up only 1.2 per cent of the total photon energy emitted by 99mTc. Standard methods of calculating the gamma component of the absorbed dose for 99mTc using the geometrical factor and {Gamma} yield results which underestimate the absorbed dose by 16 to 30 per cent compared to calculations based on Monte Carlo techniques which take into account the energy dependence of µair and the inflated value of {Gamma}. The Monte Carlo technique was used in making the absorbed dose estimates in this paper.

Absorbed dose estimates were made for 99mTc as (a) TcO4 for brain scanning, as compared to 131I labeled serum albumin and 203Hg and 97Hg labeled Neohydrin; (b) 99mTc labeled serum albumin for placental scanning, as compared to 131I labeled serum albumin; and (c) the 99mTc sulfur colloid for liver and bone marrow scanning as compared to colloidal 198Au, colloidal 199Au and 131I aggregated albumin. Some of the biological problems encountered in calculating the absorbed dose are discussed.

FOOTNOTES

1 U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare Public Health Service, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Department of Radiation Safety, Bethesda, Maryland, 20014.

2 Manuscript written during period of service at the National Institute of Health. Present address: Hospital for Special Surgery, Cornell Medical Center, 535 East 70th Street, New York 21, New York.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Copyright © 1965 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine.