JNM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH RSS TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Contractor, K. B.
Right arrow Articles by Aboagye, E. O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Contractor, K. B.
Right arrow Articles by Aboagye, E. O.
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Vol. 50 No. Suppl_1 97S-105S
© 2009 by Society of Nuclear Medicine

doi: 10.2967/jnumed.108.057273

Monitoring Predominantly Cytostatic Treatment Response with 18F-FDG PET

Kaiyumars B. Contractor and Eric O. Aboagye

Department of Oncology, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom

Correspondence: For correspondence or reprints contact: Eric O. Aboagye, Room 240, MRC Cyclotron Bldg., Clinical Sciences Centre, Imperial College London, London W12 0NN, United Kingdom. E-mail: eric.aboagye{at}imperial.ac.uk

18F-FDG PET and, more recently, PET/CT have been established as response biomarkers for monitoring cytotoxic or cytoreductive cancer therapies. With the advent of targeted cancer therapies, which are predominantly cytostatic, 18F-FDG PET is increasingly being used to monitor the therapeutic response to these agents as well. The impressive outcome of 18F-FDG PET studies in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors treated with imatinib mesylate brought to the forefront the use of this biomarker for assessing the response to targeted therapies. The use of 18F-FDG PET for this purpose has practical challenges, including quantitative analysis and timing of scans. This review provides a summary of clinical studies of targeted therapies done to date with 18F-FDG PET and provides guidance on practical issues to ensure the optimal interpretation of imaging data in drug development and for patient care.

Key Words: 18F-FDG PET • cytostatic treatment • cytoreductive therapy • response monitoring • imatinib mesylate

COPYRIGHT © 2009 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine, Inc.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JNMHome page
W. A. Weber
Assessing Tumor Response to Therapy
J. Nucl. Med., May 1, 2009; 50(Suppl_1): 1S - 10S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH RSS TABLE OF CONTENTS
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Copyright © 2009 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine.