|
|
|||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Department of Radiation Oncology, Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, St. Louis, Missouri; 2 Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri; 3 Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri; 4 Division of Nuclear Medicine, Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, St. Louis, Missouri; and 5 Division of Nuclear Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
Correspondence: For correspondence or reprints contact: Dominique Delbeke, Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 21st Ave. S. and Garland, Nashville, TN 37232-2675. E-mail: dominique.delbeke{at}vanderbilt.edu
For locally advanced cervical cancer, the current literature supports the use of 18F-FDG PET for assessing treatment response 3 mo after the completion of concurrent chemoradiation. 18F-FDG PET can provide reliable long-term prognostic information for these patients and, in the future, may be used to guide additional therapy. Investigational areas include the use of 18F-FDG PET for monitoring response during radiotherapy and chemotherapy in the metastatic and neoadjuvant settings. For ovarian masses, the performance of 18F-FDG PET in the detection of borderline tumors is limited, and the presence of physiologic 18F-FDG uptake in normal ovaries of premenopausal women poses another limitation. Preliminary data suggest that the performance of 18F-FDG PET and 18F-FDG PET/CT is superior to that of CT alone in initial staging, but the sensitivity of both in the detection of carcinomatosis is limited. Preliminary data also suggest that 18F-FDG PET may be promising for early prediction of response to chemotherapy and for prediction of response after the completion of chemotherapy. 18F-FDG PET and 18F-FDG PET/CT are most helpful in the evaluation of patients with suspected recurrent ovarian carcinoma, especially when CA-125 levels are rising and CT findings are normal or equivocal. PET and CT are complementary, and PET/CT should be used when available. Preliminary data suggest that the addition of 18F-FDG PET/CT to the evaluation of these patients changes management in approximately a third and reduces overall treatment costs by accurately identifying patients who will or will not benefit from surgery.
Key Words: therapy response cancer cervix ovary
COPYRIGHT © 2009 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine, Inc.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
V. R. Iyer and S. I. Lee MRI, CT, and PET/CT for Ovarian Cancer Detection and Adnexal Lesion Characterization Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2010; 194(2): 311 - 321. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. A. Weber Assessing Tumor Response to Therapy J. Nucl. Med., May 1, 2009; 50(Suppl_1): 1S - 10S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | RSS | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY | THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE |