JNM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH RSS TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


First published online April 20, 2009, 10.2967/jnumed.108.057257
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
jnumed.108.057257v1
50/Suppl_1/64S    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schwarz, J. K.
Right arrow Articles by Delbeke, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schwarz, J. K.
Right arrow Articles by Delbeke, D.
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Vol. 50 No. Suppl_1 64S-73S
© 2009 by Society of Nuclear Medicine

doi: 10.2967/jnumed.108.057257

The Role of 18F-FDG PET in Assessing Therapy Response in Cancer of the Cervix and Ovaries

Julie K. Schwarz1,2, Perry W. Grigsby1–3, Farrokh Dehdashti2–4 and Dominique Delbeke5

1 Department of Radiation Oncology, Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, St. Louis, Missouri; 2 Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri; 3 Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri; 4 Division of Nuclear Medicine, Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, St. Louis, Missouri; and 5 Division of Nuclear Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee

Correspondence: For correspondence or reprints contact: Dominique Delbeke, Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 21st Ave. S. and Garland, Nashville, TN 37232-2675. E-mail: dominique.delbeke{at}vanderbilt.edu

For locally advanced cervical cancer, the current literature supports the use of 18F-FDG PET for assessing treatment response 3 mo after the completion of concurrent chemoradiation. 18F-FDG PET can provide reliable long-term prognostic information for these patients and, in the future, may be used to guide additional therapy. Investigational areas include the use of 18F-FDG PET for monitoring response during radiotherapy and chemotherapy in the metastatic and neoadjuvant settings. For ovarian masses, the performance of 18F-FDG PET in the detection of borderline tumors is limited, and the presence of physiologic 18F-FDG uptake in normal ovaries of premenopausal women poses another limitation. Preliminary data suggest that the performance of 18F-FDG PET and 18F-FDG PET/CT is superior to that of CT alone in initial staging, but the sensitivity of both in the detection of carcinomatosis is limited. Preliminary data also suggest that 18F-FDG PET may be promising for early prediction of response to chemotherapy and for prediction of response after the completion of chemotherapy. 18F-FDG PET and 18F-FDG PET/CT are most helpful in the evaluation of patients with suspected recurrent ovarian carcinoma, especially when CA-125 levels are rising and CT findings are normal or equivocal. PET and CT are complementary, and PET/CT should be used when available. Preliminary data suggest that the addition of 18F-FDG PET/CT to the evaluation of these patients changes management in approximately a third and reduces overall treatment costs by accurately identifying patients who will or will not benefit from surgery.

Key Words: therapy response • cancer • cervix • ovary

COPYRIGHT © 2009 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine, Inc.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
V. R. Iyer and S. I. Lee
MRI, CT, and PET/CT for Ovarian Cancer Detection and Adnexal Lesion Characterization
Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2010; 194(2): 311 - 321.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
W. A. Weber
Assessing Tumor Response to Therapy
J. Nucl. Med., May 1, 2009; 50(Suppl_1): 1S - 10S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH RSS TABLE OF CONTENTS
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Copyright © 2009 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine.