|
|
|||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York; and 2 Molecular Pharmacology and Chemistry, Sloan-Kettering Institute for Cancer Research, New York, New York
Correspondence: For correspondence or reprints contact: Jason S. Lewis, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave., New York, New York 10065. E-mail: lewisj2{at}mskcc.org
This review article discusses PET agents, other than 18F-FDG, with the potential to monitor the response to therapy before, during, or after therapeutic intervention. This review deals primarily with non–18F-FDG PET tracers that are in the final stages of preclinical development or in the early stages of clinical application for monitoring the therapeutic response. Four sections related to the nature of the tracers are included: radiotracers of DNA synthesis, such as the 2 most promising agents, the thymidine analogs 3'-18F-fluoro-3'-deoxythymidine and 18F-1-(2'-deoxy-2'-fluoro-β-D-arabinofuranosyl)thymine; agents for PET imaging of hypoxia within tumors, such as 60/62/64Cu-labeled diacetyl-bis(N4-methylthiosemicarbazone) and 18F-fluoromisonidazole; amino acids for PET imaging, including the most popular such agent, L-[methyl-11C]methionine; and agents for the imaging of tumor expression of androgen and estrogen receptors, such as 16β-18F-fluoro-5
-dihydrotestosterone and 16
-18F-fluoro-17β-estradiol, respectively.
Key Words: PET therapy monitoring hypoxia steroid receptors proliferation
COPYRIGHT © 2009 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine, Inc.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
W. A. Weber Assessing Tumor Response to Therapy J. Nucl. Med., May 1, 2009; 50(Suppl_1): 1S - 10S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | RSS | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY | THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE |