|
|
|||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Clinical Investigation |
1 Department of Radiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio; 2 Department of Radiological Sciences, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee; 3 Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio; and 4 Department of Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee
Correspondence: For correspondence or reprints contact: Susan E. Sharp, Department of Radiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, 3333 Burnet Ave., MLC 5031, Cincinnati, OH 45229-3039. E-mail: susan.sharp{at}cchmc.org
The purpose of this study was to compare the diagnostic utility of 123I-metaiodobenzylguanidine (123I-MIBG) scintigraphy and 18F-FDG PET in neuroblastoma. Methods: A total of 113 paired 123I-MIBG and 18F-FDG PET scans in 60 patients with neuroblastoma were retrospectively reviewed. Paired scans were acquired within 14 days of each other. Results: For stage 1 and 2 neuroblastoma (13 scans, 10 patients), 18F-FDG depicted more extensive primary or residual neuroblastoma in 9 of 13 scans. 123I-MIBG and 18F-FDG showed equal numbers of lesions in 1 of 13 scans, and 3 of 13 scan results were normal. For stage 3 neuroblastoma (15 scans, 10 patients), 123I-MIBG depicted more extensive primary neuroblastoma or local or regional metastases in 5 of 15 scans. 18F-FDG depicted more extensive primary neuroblastoma or local or regional metastases in 4 of 15 scans. 123I-MIBG and 18F-FDG were equal in 2 of 15 scans, and 4 of 15 scan results were normal. For stage 4 neuroblastoma (85 scans, 40 patients), 123I-MIBG depicted more neuroblastoma sites in 44 of 85 scans. 18F-FDG depicted more neuroblastoma sites in 11 of 85 scans. 123I-MIBG and 18F-FDG were equivalent or complementary in 13 of 85 scans, and 17 of 85 scan results were normal. Conclusion: 18F-FDG is superior in depicting stage 1 and 2 neuroblastoma, although 123I-MIBG may be needed to exclude higher-stage disease. 18F-FDG also provides important information for patients with tumors that weakly accumulate 123I-MIBG and at major decision points during therapy (i.e., before stem cell transplantation or before surgery). 18F-FDG can also better delineate disease extent in the chest, abdomen, and pelvis. 123I-MIBG is overall superior in the evaluation of stage 4 neuroblastoma, especially during initial chemotherapy, primarily because of the better detection of bone or marrow metastases.
Key Words: neuroblastoma 123I-MIBG 18F-FDG PET
COPYRIGHT © 2009 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine, Inc.
Related articles in JNM:
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. E. Sharp, B. L Shulkin, M. J. Gelfand, and S. Salisbury Reply: 123I-MIBG Scintigraphy and 18F-FDG PET in Neuroblastoma J. Nucl. Med., February 1, 2010; 51(2): 331 - 331. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. F. Heston 123I-MIBG Versus 18F-FDG: Which Is Better, or Which Can Be Eliminated? J. Nucl. Med., February 1, 2010; 51(2): 330 - 330. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. C. Nguyen, D. Bhatla, and M. M. Osman 123I-MIBG Scintigraphy and 18F-FDG PET in Neuroblastoma J. Nucl. Med., February 1, 2010; 51(2): 330 - 331. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | RSS | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY | THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE |