HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH RSS TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: jnumed.109.062075v1 50/8/1205    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Related articles in JNM Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Rodrigues, R. S. Articles by Morton, K. A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Rodrigues, R. S. Articles by Morton, K. A.

Comparison of Whole-Body PET/CT, Dedicated High-Resolution Head and Neck PET/CT, and Contrast-Enhanced CT in Preoperative Staging of Clinically M0 Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck

¹ Biomaging–INBEB and Department of Radiology, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; ² Fundação Oswaldo Cruz and National Institute of Science and Technology in Structural Biology and Bioimaging–INBEB, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; ³ Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah; ⁴ Department of Radiology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah; ⁵ Division of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah; and ⁶ Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah

Correspondence: For correspondence or reprints contact: Kathryn A. Morton, Department of Radiology, University of Utah, 1A71 SOM, 50 N. Medical Dr., Salt Lake City, UT 84132. E-mail: kathryn.morton{at}hsc.utah.edu

The purpose of this study was to compare optimized whole-body (WB) and dedicated high-resolution contrast-enhanced PET/CT protocols and contrast enhanced CT in the preoperative staging of primary squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Methods: A total of 44 patients with clinically M0 squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck underwent primary tumor resection and neck dissection within 6 wk of diagnostic imaging. Imaging consisted of a standard WB PET/CT protocol without intravenous contrast enhancement, followed by a high-resolution dedicated head and neck (HN) PET/CT protocol, which included diagnostic-quality contrast-enhanced CT (CECT). Imaging results were compared with histopathology. A 5-point scale was used to designate primary tumor localization and the presence of lymph node metastasis on a per-patient and per-level basis. For cervical nodes, receiver-operating-characteristic curves were generated to determine the differences in performance between the WB and HN PET/CT protocols and CECT. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and accuracy were calculated for primary tumor and cervical nodes. Results: No statistical difference was observed between WB and HN PET/CT protocols, both of which significantly outperformed CECT, in the evaluation of the primary tumor. The performance of the HN PET/CT protocol was superior to that of the WB PET/CT in the detection of cervical node metastases, achieving statistical significance on a per-level basis and approaching significance on a per-patient basis, with the greatest advantage in the detection of small positive lymph nodes (<15 mm). No significant difference was observed between the WB PET/CT protocol and CECT in nodal staging, either on a per-patient or on a per-level basis. Conclusion: The primary advantage of the dedicated HN PET/CT protocol over the WB protocol or CECT in the staging of head and neck cancer is in the detection of small lymph node metastases.

Key Words: positron emission tomography • computed tomography • head and neck cancer • squamous cell carcinoma • tumor staging

COPYRIGHT © 2009 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine, Inc.

Related articles in JNM:

This Month in JNM

JNM 2009 50: 11A-12A. [Full Text]