JNM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH RSS TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


First published online June 12, 2009, 10.2967/jnumed.108.061325
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
jnumed.108.061325v1
50/7/1124    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in JNM
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nimmagadda, S.
Right arrow Articles by Pomper, M. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nimmagadda, S.
Right arrow Articles by Pomper, M. G.
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Vol. 50 No. 7 1124-1130
© 2009 by Society of Nuclear Medicine

doi: 10.2967/jnumed.108.061325

Basic Science Investigation

Immunoimaging of CXCR4 Expression in Brain Tumor Xenografts Using SPECT/CT

Sridhar Nimmagadda, Mrudula Pullambhatla and Martin G. Pomper

Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland

Correspondence: For correspondence or reprints contact: Martin G. Pomper, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, 1550 Orleans St., 492 CRB II, Baltimore, MD 21231. E-mail: mpomper{at}jhmi.edu

Chemokine receptor 4 (CXCR4) is expressed in a variety of cancers, including breast, brain, ovarian, and prostate. CXCR4–CXCL12 interactions are critical for tumor development, growth, and metastasis. Compared with normal tissue, neoplastic tissue (including metastases) expresses high levels of CXCR4. Previous clinical and preclinical observations suggest that CXCR4 levels could be used as a predictive marker of metastatic potential. Here we report the results of SPECT/CT of CXCR4 expression levels in experimental brain tumors using 125I-labeled anti-CXCR4 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs). Methods: hCXCR4 antibody 12G5 and control IgG2A antibody were radiolabeled. Radio-mAbs were obtained in 40%–60% yield, with 1.4–1.9 MBq/µg specific radioactivities and greater than 95% purity. Severe combined immunodeficient mice harboring U87 xenografts were used for ex vivo biodistribution and imaging studies. Surface CXCR4 expression levels on U87 tumor–derived cells were analyzed by flow cytometry. Results: Biodistribution and imaging studies showed a specific accumulation of 125I-12G5 in U87 tumors, with tumor-to-muscle uptake ratios reaching 15 ± 3 at 48 h after injection. The tumor-to-tumor uptake ratio for 125I-12G5 and 125I-IgG2A was 2.5 at 48 h after injection. Flow cytometry analysis of tumor-derived cells showed a 2- to 7-fold increase in CXCR4 expression relative to inoculums, accounting for the high mAb uptake observed in the tumors. Conclusion: Our data demonstrate the feasibility of imaging CXCR4 expression in experimental brain tumors. The elevated CXCR4 levels observed may have been, in part, due to the hypoxic tumor microenvironment.

Key Words: hypoxia • tumor microenvironment • molecular imaging • xenograft • chemokine

COPYRIGHT © 2009 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine, Inc.


Related articles in JNM:

This Month in JNM

JNM 2009 50: 11A-12A. [Full Text]  






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH RSS TABLE OF CONTENTS
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Copyright © 2009 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine.