JNM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH RSS TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


First published online May 14, 2009, 10.2967/jnumed.108.060533
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
jnumed.108.060533v1
50/6/966    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in JNM
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yu, A. S.
Right arrow Articles by Wu, H.-M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yu, A. S.
Right arrow Articles by Wu, H.-M.
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Vol. 50 No. 6 966-973
© 2009 by Society of Nuclear Medicine

doi: 10.2967/jnumed.108.060533

Basic Science Investigation

Quantification of Cerebral Glucose Metabolic Rate in Mice Using 18F-FDG and Small-Animal PET

Amy S. Yu, Hong-Dun Lin, Sung-Cheng Huang, Michael E. Phelps and Hsiao-Ming Wu

Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, California

Correspondence: For correspondence or reprints contact: Hsiao-Ming Wu, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, UCLA, 10833 Le Conte Ave., Los Angeles, CA 90095-6948. E-mail: cwu{at}mednet.ucla.edu

The aim of this study was to evaluate various methods for estimating the metabolic rate of glucose utilization in the mouse brain (cMRglc) using small-animal PET and reliable blood curves derived by a microfluidic blood sampler. Typical values of 18F-FDG rate constants of normal mouse cerebral cortex were estimated and used for cMRglc calculations. The feasibility of using the image-derived liver time–activity curve as a surrogate input function in various quantification methods was also evaluated. Methods: Thirteen normoglycemic C57BL/6 mice were studied. Eighteen blood samples were taken from the femoral artery by the microfluidic blood sampler. Tissue time–activity curves were derived from PET images. cMRglc values were calculated using 2 different input functions (one derived from the blood samples [IFblood] and the other from the liver time–activity curve [IFliver]) in various quantification methods, which included the 3-compartment 18F-FDG model (from which the 18F-FDG rate constants were derived), the Patlak analysis, and operational equations. The estimated cMRglc value based on IFblood and the 3-compartment model served as a standard for comparisons with the cMRglc values calculated by the other methods. Results: The values of Formula, Formula, Formula, Formula, and Formula estimated by IFblood and the 3-compartment model were 0.22 ± 0.05 mL/min/g, 0.48 ± 0.09 min–1, 0.06 ± 0.02 min–1, 0.025 ± 0.010 min–1, and 0.024 ± 0.007 mL/min/g, respectively. The standard cMRglc value was, therefore, 40.6 ± 13.3 µmol/100 g/min (lumped constant = 0.6). No significant difference between the standard cMRglc and the cMRglc estimated by the operational equation that includes Formula was observed. The standard cMRglc was also found to have strong correlations (r > 0.8) with the cMRglc value estimated by the use of IFliver in the 3-compartment model and with those estimated by the Patlak analysis (using either IFblood or IFliver). Conclusion: The 18F-FDG rate constants of normal mouse cerebral cortex were determined. These values can be used in the Formula-included operational equation to calculate cMRglc. IFliver can be used to estimate cMRglc in most methods included in this study, with proper linear corrections applied. The validity of using the Patlak analysis for estimating cMRglc in mouse PET studies was also confirmed.

Key Words: 18F-FDG rate constants of mouse brain • microfluidic blood sampler • noninvasive input function

Guest Editor: Tove Gronroos, Turku PET Centre

COPYRIGHT © 2009 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine, Inc.


Related articles in JNM:

This Month in JNM

JNM 2009 50: 11A-12A. [Full Text]  






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH RSS TABLE OF CONTENTS
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Copyright © 2009 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine.