|
|
|||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Basic Science Investigation |
4β1 Integrin: Comparative Pharmacokinetics for Imaging and Therapy of Lymphoid Malignancies1 Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, UC Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, California; 2 Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of California, Davis, Davis, California; 3 Center for Molecular and Genomic Imaging, University of California, Davis, Davis, California; and 4 Department of Radiology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri
Correspondence: For correspondence or reprints contact: Sally DeNardo, Department of Internal Medicine, UC Davis School of Medicine, University of California, 1508 Alhambra Blvd., Room 3100, Sacramento, CA 95816. E-mail: sjdenardo{at}ucdavis.edu
N-[[4-[[[(2-ethylphenyl)amino]carbonyl]amino]phenyl]acetyl]-N
-6-[(2E)-1-oxo-3-(3-pyridinyl-2-propenyl)]-L-lysyl-L-2-aminohexanedioyl-(1-amino-1-cyclohexane)carboxamide (LLP2A) is a high-affinity, high-specificity peptidomimetic ligand (inhibitory concentration of 50% = 2 pM) that binds the activated
4β1 integrin found on a variety of malignant lymphoid cell lines. To better determine whether this ligand holds promise for imaging and therapy in lymphoid malignancies, 6 LLP2A derivatives, as LLP2A-1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-N,N',N'',N'''-tetraacetic acid (LLP2A-DOTA) and LLP2A-DOTA-polyethylene glycol (LLP2A-DOTA-PEG), were designed, synthesized, and radiolabeled with 111In. Comparative pharmacokinetic studies in mice with Raji B-cell lymphoma xenografts were then complemented by small-animal PET of the lead molecular LLP2A format using 64Cu-LLP2A-11-bis(carboxymethyl)-1,4,8,11-tetraazabicyclo[6.6.2]hexadecane (64Cu-LLP2A-CB-TE2A). Methods: LLP2A-DOTA and LLP2A-CB-TE2A were prepared using solid-phase synthesis; LLP2A-DOTA-PEG2,000, LLP2A-DOTA-PEG5,000, LLP2A-DOTA-PEG10,000, (LLP2A-DOTA)2PEG10,000, and (LLP2A-DOTA)4PEG10,000 were prepared by PEGylation. 111In radiolabeling of DOTA and 64Cu radiolabeling of CB-TE2A conjugates yielded 370–1,850 and 3,700–7,400 kBq/µg (10–50 and 100–200 µCi/µg), respectively. The pharmacokinetics of the six 111In radioconjugates were studied in vivo using biodistribution data (4 and 24 h) and whole-body autoradiography (24 h) in mice with Raji tumor xenografts. 64Cu-LLP2A-CB-TE2A was imaged (4 and 24 h) on a small-animal PET scanner in the same mouse model. Results: The highest tumor uptake in pharmacokinetic studies was obtained with LLP2A-DOTA and (LLP2A-DOTA)4-PEG10,000. For 111In-LLP2A-DOTA (1 nM) at 4 and 24 h after injection, ratios of tumor to blood and tumor to nontumor (normal) organ (T/NT) were 8 to 35:1 for all organs or tissue except the spleen, marrow, and kidney, which were between 2:1 and 1:1. Tetravalent (LLP2A-DOTA)4-PEG10,000 (1.1 nM) had tumor uptake similar to the univalent LLP2A-DOTA but higher liver, marrow, and kidney uptake. The excellent T/NT of LLP2A was also demonstrated by small-animal PET with 64Cu-LLP2A-CB-TE2A at both 4 and 24 h after injection; obvious spleen targeting was apparent, but little kidney or liver activity was observed. Conclusion: Of the conjugates investigated, the univalent, non-PEGylated ligand 111In-LLP2A-DOTA exhibited the best T/NT ratios and showed the greatest potential for imaging of
4β1 in human lymphoma. Furthermore, this univalent non-PEGylated LLP2A format, as 64Cu-LLP2A-CB-TE2A, demonstrated excellent tumor targeting by small-animal PET and warrants further investigation as an agent for the study of
4β1 expression in human lymphoid malignancies.
Key Words:
4β PEGylation 111In 64Cu PET
COPYRIGHT © 2009 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine, Inc.
Related articles in JNM:
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. M. Chirgwin, C. M. Edwards, E. A. Pedersen, Y. Shiozawa, R. S. Taichman, S. I. Park, L. K. McCauley, T. Matsumoto, and M. Abe Meeting Report from the IX International Meeting on Cancer Induced Bone Disease: October 28-31, 2009 in Arlington, Virginia, USA IBMS BoneKEy, January 1, 2010; 7(1): 32 - 46. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | RSS | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY | THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE |