JNM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH RSS TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     




First published online November 12, 2009, 10.2967/jnumed.109.065300
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
jnumed.109.065300v1
50/12/1940    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in JNM
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Krabbe, C. A.
Right arrow Articles by Roodenburg, J. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Krabbe, C. A.
Right arrow Articles by Roodenburg, J. L.
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Vol. 50 No. 12 1940-1947
© 2009 by Society of Nuclear Medicine

doi: 10.2967/jnumed.109.065300

Clinical Investigation

18F-FDG PET as a Routine Posttreatment Surveillance Tool in Oral and Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A ProspectiveStudy

Christiaan A. Krabbe1, Jan Pruim2, Pieter U. Dijkstra1,3,4, Hans Balink5, Bernard F. van der Laan6, Jan G. de Visscher7 and Jan L. Roodenburg1

1 Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands; 2 Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands; 3 Center for Rehabilitation, University Medical Center, Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands; 4 School for Health Research, University Medical Center, Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands; 5 Department of Nuclear Medicine, Medical Center Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, The Netherlands; 6 Department Otorhinolaryngology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands; and 7 Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Medical Center Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, The Netherlands

Correspondence: For correspondence or reprints contact: Christiaan A. Krabbe, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, P.O. Box 30.001, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands. E-mail: c.a.krabbe{at}kchir.umcg.nl

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the role and timing of serial 18F-FDG PET scans as routine surveillance for detecting early locoregional recurrence, distant metastases, and second primary tumors in patients treated for advanced squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) in the oral cavity or oropharynx during the first year after completion of their curative treatment. Methods: Forty-eight consecutive patients with SCC in the oral cavity or oropharynx were included after completing their initial therapy with curative intent. Prospective follow-up of the participants was 2-fold: regular follow-up (history and physical examination) and serial 18F-FDG PET scans. Patients underwent standard follow-up and 18F-FDG PET at 3, 6, 9, and 12 mo after initial treatment. Findings were validated by histopathology or 18 mo of clinical follow-up and imaging after initial treatment. Results: Incidence of recurrences and second primary tumors was 27% and 10%, respectively. 18F-FDG PET was significantly (P = 0.035) more often in agreement with the gold standard than was regular follow-up. 18F-FDG PET showed a sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of 100%, 43%, 51%, and 100%, respectively. For regular follow-up, these values were 0%, 60%, 0%, and 50%, respectively. 18F-FDG PET accounted for a change in diagnostics or treatment in 63% of the patients and regular follow-up in 25% of the patients. Sensitivity and specificity of 18F-FDG PET were both irrespective of timing of 18F-FDG PET. For the 3- and 6-mo posttherapy results combined, 18F-FDG PET detected malignancy in 16 of the 18 patients. Conclusion: 18F-FDG PET is a suitable routine posttreatment surveillance tool in oral and oropharyngeal SCC patients and detects malignancy before clinical suggestion by the regular follow-up arises. The best timing of a systematic 18F-FDG PET scan is between 3 and 6 mo after treatment.

Key Words: positron emission tomography • squamous cell carcinoma • head and neck cancer • fluorodeoxyglucose • recurrence

COPYRIGHT © 2009 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine, Inc.


Related articles in JNM:

This Month in JNM

JNM 2009 50: 11A-12A. [Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JNMHome page
N. C. Nguyen, P. Fajnwak, M. M. Osman, and H. R. Farghaly
18F-FDG PET for Routine Posttreatment Surveillance in Oral and Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
J. Nucl. Med., July 1, 2010; 51(7): 1164 - 1164.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
C. A. Krabbe, J. Pruim, P. U. Dijkstra, and J. L. N. Roodenburg
Reply: 18F-FDG PET for Routine Posttreatment Surveillance in Oral and Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
J. Nucl. Med., July 1, 2010; 51(7): 1164 - 1165.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH RSS TABLE OF CONTENTS
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Copyright © 2009 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine.