JNM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow CME Activity
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in JNM
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ben-Haim, S.
Right arrow Articles by Ell, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ben-Haim, S.
Right arrow Articles by Ell, P.
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Vol. 50 No. 1 88-99
© 2009 by Society of Nuclear Medicine

doi: 10.2967/jnumed.108.054205

Continuing Education

18F-FDG PET and PET/CT in the Evaluation of Cancer Treatment Response*

Simona Ben-Haim and Peter Ell

Institute of Nuclear Medicine University College London, London, United Kingdom

Correspondence: For correspondence or reprints contact: Simona Ben-Haim, Institute of Nuclear Medicine, University College London Hospital, NHS Trust, 235 Euston Rd. T5, London, NW1 2BU U.K. E-mail: Simona.ben-haim{at}uclh.nhs.uk

Multimodality imaging, as represented by its greatest exponent, PET/CT, has a firm place in the evaluation of a patient presenting with cancer. With 18F-FDG, PET/CT is rapidly becoming the key investigative tool for the staging and assessment of cancer recurrence. In the last 5 y, PET/CT has also gained widespread acceptance as a key tool used to demonstrate early response to intervention and therapy. In this setting, a major clinical need is being addressed with 18F-FDG PET/CT, because of its inherent ability to demonstrate (before other markers of response) if disease modification has occurred. This review presents available evidence to this effect.

Key Words: 18F-FDG • PET • PET/CT • tumor response • treatment monitoring • outcome

* NOTE: FOR CE CREDIT, YOU CAN ACCESS THIS ACTIVITY THROUGH THE SNM WEB SITE (http://www.snm.org/ce_online) THROUGH JANUARY 2010.

The authors have indicated no relevant relationships that could be perceived as a real or apparent conflict of interest. No other potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

COPYRIGHT © 2009 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine, Inc.


Related articles in JNM:

This Month in JNM

JNM 2009 50: 11A-12A. [Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ScienceHome page
M. G. Vander Heiden, L. C. Cantley, and C. B. Thompson
Understanding the Warburg Effect: The Metabolic Requirements of Cell Proliferation
Science, May 22, 2009; 324(5930): 1029 - 1033.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Copyright © 2009 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine.