|
|
||||||||
Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland
Correspondence: For correspondence or reprints contact: Martin G. Pomper, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions 1550 Orleans St., 492 CRB II Baltimore, MD 21231. E-mail: mpomper{at}jhmi.edu
If molecular imaging is to prove clinically useful it will have to surpass current, primarily anatomic techniques in terms of sensitivity and the ability to detect minimal changes in tissue. One of the most important tests for molecular imaging is to determine whether it can image the metastatic potential of tumors. Like all predictive endeavors, the imaging of such "potential" is a daunting task, but one that only molecular imaging—rather than standard, anatomic techniques—is likely to solve. Although difficult, imaging of metastatic potential is also arguably the most important task for molecular imaging of cancer because it is generally the dissemination of malignant tissue, not its prolonged residence in an inopportune site, which kills the patient. Below are examples of uses of molecular imaging of metastases as well as of metastatic potential, the former being a far more developed area of clinical inquiry.
Key Words: magnetic resonance imaging radiopharmaceutical PET SPECT optical imaging bioluminescence fluorescence metastasis
COPYRIGHT © 2008 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine, Inc.
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY | THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE |