|
|
|||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Basic Science Investigation |
1 Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; 2 Department of Hematology and Oncology, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; 3 Division of Stem Cell and Developmental Biology, Ontario Cancer Institute, Ontario, Canada; 4 Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; and 5 Division of Pathophysiology and Clinical Investigation, Toronto General Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Correspondence: For correspondence or reprints contact: Raymond M. Reilly, Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, 144 College St., Toronto, Ontario M5S 3M2. E-mail: Raymond.Reilly{at}utoronto.ca
Multidrug resistance (MDR) is a major challenge to the successful treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Our purpose was to determine whether 111In-HuM195 anti-CD33 antibodies modified with peptides harboring nuclear localizing sequences (NLS) could kill drug-resistant AML cell lines and primary AML patient specimens expressing MDR transporters through the emission of Auger electrons. Methods: HuM195, M195, and irrelevant mouse IgG (mIgG) were conjugated to 10 ± 3 NLS peptides and then labeled with 111In by diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid substitution to a specific activity of 1–8 MBq/µg. The binding affinity of HuM195 and M195 was determined for HL-60 and mitoxantrone-resistant HL-60-MX-1 cells. Nuclear localization of 111In-NLS-HuM195, 111In-NLS-M195, 111In-HuM195, and 111In-M195 was measured by subcellular fractionation. The antiproliferative effects of 111In-NLS-HuM195, 111In-NLS-M195, 111In-HuM195, and 111In-M195 (2.5–250 kBq/well) on HL-60 and HL-60-MX-1 were studied using the WST-1 assay. Clonogenic survival of HL-60 and HL-60-MX-1 leukemic cells and 10 primary AML specimens with MDR phenotype (assessed by flow cytometry) was determined after exposure for 3 h at 37°C to 2.5–250 mBq/cell of 111In-NLS-HuM195, 111In-HuM195, or 111In-NLS-mIgG. Clonogenic survival versus the amount of radioactivity incubated with the cells (mBq/cell) was plotted, and the mean lethal amount of radioactivity and the lower asymptote of the curve (plateau) were determined. Results: The 111In-labeled anti-CD33 monoclonal antibodies HuM195 and M195 modified with NLS were efficiently routed to the nucleus of HL-60 cells and their mitoxantrone-resistant clone after CD33-mediated internalization. The following are the principal findings of our study: 111In-NLS-HuM195 was more effective at killing HL-60 and HL-60-MX-1 cells than was 111In-HuM195, a strong correlation between the specific activity of the 111In-labeled radioimmunoconjugates and their cytotoxicity toward AML cells existed, and leukemic cells from patients were killed by 111In-NLS-M195 or 111In-M195, but the cytotoxic response among specimens was heterogeneous. Conclusion: NLS conjugation enhanced the nuclear uptake and cytotoxicity of 111In-HuM195 and 111In-M195 toward drug-resistant AML cell lines as well as patient specimens expressing a diversity of MDR phenotypes, including Pgp-170, BCRP1, or MRP1 transporters. Targeted Auger electron radioimmunotherapy using 111In-labeled anti-CD33 monoclonal antibodies modified with NLS may be able to overcome MDR and provide a means of treating chemotherapy-resistant myeloid leukemias in patients.
Key Words: acute myelogenous leukemia 111In Auger electrons CD33 multidrug resistance
COPYRIGHT © 2008 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine, Inc.
Related articles in JNM:
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. H. Weisburg Multidrug Resistance in Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Potential New Therapeutics J. Nucl. Med., September 1, 2008; 49(9): 1405 - 1407. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. L. Costantini, K. Bateman, K. McLarty, K. A. Vallis, and R. M. Reilly Trastuzumab-Resistant Breast Cancer Cells Remain Sensitive to the Auger Electron-Emitting Radiotherapeutic Agent 111In-NLS-Trastuzumab and Are Radiosensitized by Methotrexate J. Nucl. Med., September 1, 2008; 49(9): 1498 - 1505. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | RSS | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY | THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE |