HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH RSS TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: jnumed.108.051797v1 49/8/1283    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Related articles in JNM Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Sciagrà, R. Articles by Pupi, A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Sciagrà, R. Articles by Pupi, A.

Assessment of the Influence of Atrial Fibrillation on Gated SPECT Perfusion Data by Comparison with Simultaneously Acquired Nongated SPECT Data

Nuclear Medicine Unit, Department of Clinical Physiopathology, University of Florence, Florence, Italy

Correspondence: For correspondence or reprints contact: Roberto Sciagrà, Nuclear Medicine Unit, Department of Clinical Physiopathology, University of Florence, Viale Morgagni 85, 50134 Florence, Italy. E-mail: r.sciagra{at}dfc.unifi.it

The impact of arrhythmias on the evaluation of perfusion data from myocardial gated SPECT has been assessed by comparing arrhythmic patients with nonarrhythmic patients or by simulating rhythm disturbances. Whether gating-related artifacts may have a clinically relevant influence on the evaluation of perfusion in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients is still uncertain. Recently, collection of nongated and gated datasets during the same SPECT acquisition has become possible. The aim of this study was to examine the difference in myocardial perfusion between simultaneously acquired gated and nongated SPECT data in AF patients. Methods: In 44 consecutive AF patients who underwent myocardial perfusion SPECT for standard clinical indications, both a gated and a nongated study were simultaneously acquired. Perfusion was estimated in a masked manner on a 20-segment model using an established scoring scheme. Results: Agreement was good between the gated and nongated perfusion scores on a segment basis; the agreement for resting scores was the highest, with those for stress and difference scores being lower (Spearman = 0.82, 0.74, and 0.55, respectively). On a patient basis, a similar trend was seen in summed resting scores ( = 0.911), summed stress scores ( = 0.779), and summed difference scores ( = 0.596). When summed stress and summed difference data were grouped by severity class (normal, mild abnormality, moderate abnormality, and severe abnormality), agreement decreased from = 0.818, = 0.639, for summed stress score to = 0.549, = 0.367, for summed difference score. The severity class of inducible ischemia changed in 17 patients (39%) if a (summed) gated image was used instead of a standard nongated perfusion image. Conclusion: AF may have a clinically relevant impact on summed gated perfusion images, compared with images simultaneously obtained without gating in the same patients. Therefore, acquisition of a nongated SPECT study is mandatory for accurate assessment of myocardial perfusion in AF patients.

Key Words: atrial fibrillation • gated SPECT • myocardial perfusion imaging

COPYRIGHT © 2008 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine, Inc.

Related articles in JNM:

This Month in JNM

JNM 2008 49: 11A-12A. [Full Text]  

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. D. Smit, R. A. Tio, R. H.J.A. Slart, F. Zijlstra, and I. C. Van Gelder Myocardial perfusion imaging does not adequately assess the risk of coronary artery disease in patients with atrial fibrillation Europace, December 17, 2009; (2009) eup404v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]