|
|
|||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Clinical Investigation |
1 Division of Nuclear Medicine, Kanagawa Cancer Center, Yokohama, Japan; and 2 Department of Radiology, Yokohama City University School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan
Correspondence: For correspondence or reprints contact: Tsuyoshi Kawano, Division of Nuclear Medicine, Kanagawa Cancer Center Nakao 1-1-2, Asahi-ku, Yokohama, 241-0815, Japan. E-mail: kawanotsuyoshi{at}hotmail.com
Our aim was to compare the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) between breath-hold (BH) PET/CT and free-breathing (FB) PET/CT. Methods: The features of phantom data were analyzed, after which a clinical study was performed. A total of 108 consecutive patients with lung cancer were examined using lutetium oxyorthosilicate (LSO)–based PET/CT. The patients were instructed to breathe freely during FB PET/CT. In BH PET/CT, the patients were instructed to hold their breath in the maximal inspiration position during the scout scan, for 10 s of the CT scan, and for as long as possible during the PET scan. BH time was recorded using a respiratory monitoring device. The %BH-index was defined as the percentage difference between SUVmax of FB PET and that of BH PET. Statistical analyses were performed using the following factors: %BH-index, age, body mass index, 18F-FDG dosage, blood glucose, BH time, lesion size, and location. Results: The highest %BH-index was 223.2. %BH-index in the lower lung area was significantly higher than that in the upper lung area (51.8 ± 49.5 vs. 16.9 ± 25.6, respectively). Lesion volume and maximum diameter in the high–%BH-index group were significantly lower than those in the low–%BH-index group, with the use of a %BH-index cutoff value of 37.l. Conclusion: SUVmax of FB PET should not be taken as accurate, especially in the lower lung area and for small pulmonary lesions. BH PET/CT is expected to enable precise measurement of SUVmax and is thus recommended as part of the standard protocol for lung cancer.
Key Words: deep-inspiration breath-hold PET/CT maximum SUV lutetium oxyorthosilicate lung cancer
COPYRIGHT © 2008 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine, Inc.
Related articles in JNM:
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
G. Chang, T. Chang, T. Pan, J. W. Clark Jr., and O. R. Mawlawi Implementation of an Automated Respiratory Amplitude Gating Technique for PET/CT: Clinical Evaluation J. Nucl. Med., January 1, 2010; 51(1): 16 - 24. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. K. Werner, J. A. Parker, G. M. Kolodny, J. R. English, and M. R. Palmer Respiratory Gating Enhances Imaging of Pulmonary Nodules and Measurement of Tracer Uptake in FDG PET/CT Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2009; 193(6): 1640 - 1645. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Torizuka, Y. Tanizaki, T. Kanno, M. Futatsubashi, E. Yoshikawa, H. Okada, and Y. Ouchi Single 20-Second Acquisition of Deep-Inspiration Breath-Hold PET/CT: Clinical Feasibility for Lung Cancer J. Nucl. Med., October 1, 2009; 50(10): 1579 - 1584. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. C. Ford, J. Herman, E. Yorke, and R. L. Wahl 18F-FDG PET/CT for Image-Guided and Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy J. Nucl. Med., October 1, 2009; 50(10): 1655 - 1665. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | RSS | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY | THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE |