JNM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH RSS TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


First published online May 15, 2008, 10.2967/jnumed.107.050294
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
jnumed.107.050294v1
49/6/871    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in JNM
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rudd, J. H.F.
Right arrow Articles by Fayad, Z. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rudd, J. H.F.
Right arrow Articles by Fayad, Z. A.
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Vol. 49 No. 6 871-878
© 2008 by Society of Nuclear Medicine

doi: 10.2967/jnumed.107.050294

Clinical Investigation

Atherosclerosis Inflammation Imaging with 18F-FDG PET: Carotid, Iliac, and Femoral Uptake Reproducibility, Quantification Methods, and Recommendations

James H.F. Rudd*,1, Kelly S. Myers*,1, Sameer Bansilal2, Josef Machac3, Cathy Anne Pinto4, Christopher Tong4, Ash Rafique3, Richard Hargeaves4, Michael Farkouh2, Valentin Fuster5 and Zahi A. Fayad1

1 Imaging Science Laboratories, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, New York; 2 Cardiovascular Imaging Clinical Trials Unit, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, New York; 3 Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, New York; 4 Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, New York, and Merck Research Laboratories, Rahway, New Jersey; and 5 The Zena and Michael A. Wiener Cardiovascular Institute and Marie-Josée and Henry R. Kravis Cardiovascular Health Center, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, New York

Correspondence: For correspondence or reprints contact either of the following: James Rudd, ACCI, Box 110, Addenbrokes Hospital, Cambridge CB2 2QQ, U.K. E-mail: jhfr2{at}cam.ac.uk Zahi A. Fayad, ISL, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, One Gustave L. Levy Place, Box 1030, New York, NY 10029. E-mail: zahi.fayad{at}mssm.edu

Atherosclerosis imaging with 18F-FDG PET is useful for tracking inflammation within plaque and monitoring the response to drug therapy. Short-term reproducibility of this technique in peripheral artery disease has not been assessed, and the optimal method of 18F-FDG quantification is still debated. We imaged 20 patients with vascular disease using 18F-FDG PET twice, 14 d apart, and used these data to assess reproducibility measures and compare 2 methods of 18F-FDG uptake measurement. We also reviewed the literature on quantification methods to determine the optimal measures of arterial 18F-FDG uptake for future studies. Methods: Twenty patients with vascular disease underwent PET/CT of the iliac, femoral, and carotid arteries 90 min after 18F-FDG administration. In 19 patients, repeat testing was performed at 2 wk. Coregistration and attenuation correction were performed with CT. Vessel 18F-FDG uptake was measured as both the mean and maximum blood-normalized standardized uptake value (SUV), known as the target-to-background ratio (TBR). We assessed interscan, interobserver, and intraobserver agreement. Results: Nineteen patients completed both imaging sessions. The carotid and peripheral arteries all have excellent short-term reproducibility of the 18F-FDG signal, with intraclass correlation coefficients all greater than 0.8 for all measures of reproducibility. Both mean and maximum TBR measurements for quantifying 18F-FDG uptake are equally reproducible. 18F-FDG uptake was significantly higher in the carotid arteries than in both iliac and femoral vessels (P < 0.001 for both). Conclusion: We found that both mean and maximum TBR in the carotid, iliac, and femoral arteries were highly reproducible. We suggest the mean TBR be used for tracking systemic arterial therapies, whereas the maximum TBR is optimal for detecting and monitoring local, plaque-based therapy.

Key Words: atherosclerosis • positron emission tomography • 18F-FDG • inflammation • methodology

* Contributed equally to this work.

COPYRIGHT © 2008 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine, Inc.


Related articles in JNM:

This Month in JNM

JNM 2008 49: 13A-14A. [Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JNMHome page
A. Rominger, T. Saam, E. Vogl, C. Ubleis, C. la Fougere, S. Forster, A. Haug, P. Cumming, M. F. Reiser, K. Nikolaou, et al.
In Vivo Imaging of Macrophage Activity in the Coronary Arteries Using 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT: Correlation with Coronary Calcium Burden and Risk Factors
J. Nucl. Med., February 1, 2010; 51(2): 193 - 197.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
Y. Liu, D. Abendschein, G. E. Woodard, R. Rossin, K. McCommis, J. Zheng, M. J. Welch, and P. K. Woodard
Molecular Imaging of Atherosclerotic Plaque with 64Cu-Labeled Natriuretic Peptide and PET
J. Nucl. Med., January 1, 2010; 51(1): 85 - 91.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
P. Libby, P. M. Ridker, G. K. Hansson, and for the Leducq Transatlantic Network on Atherothro
Inflammation in Atherosclerosis From Pathophysiology to Practice.
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., December 1, 2009; 54(23): 2129 - 2138.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Trop Med HygHome page
C. M. Prado, E. J. Fine, W. Koba, D. Zhao, M. A. Rossi, H. B. Tanowitz, and L. A. Jelicks
Micro-Positron Emission Tomography in the Evaluation of Trypanosoma cruzi-Induced Heart Disease: Comparison with Other Modalities
Am J Trop Med Hyg, November 1, 2009; 81(5): 900 - 905.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
C. M. Matter, M. Stuber, and M. Nahrendorf
Imaging of the unstable plaque: how far have we got?
Eur. Heart J., November 1, 2009; 30(21): 2566 - 2574.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll Cardiol ImgHome page
M. Nahrendorf, E. Keliher, P. Panizzi, H. Zhang, S. Hembrador, J.-L. Figueiredo, E. Aikawa, K. Kelly, P. Libby, and R. Weissleder
18F-4V for PET-CT Imaging of VCAM-1 Expression in Atherosclerosis
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Img., October 1, 2009; 2(10): 1213 - 1222.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
A. Rominger, T. Saam, S. Wolpers, C. C. Cyran, M. Schmidt, S. Foerster, K. Nikolaou, M. F. Reiser, P. Bartenstein, and M. Hacker
18F-FDG PET/CT Identifies Patients at Risk for Future Vascular Events in an Otherwise Asymptomatic Cohort with Neoplastic Disease
J. Nucl. Med., October 1, 2009; 50(10): 1611 - 1620.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
M. Nahrendorf, P. Waterman, G. Thurber, K. Groves, M. Rajopadhye, P. Panizzi, B. Marinelli, E. Aikawa, M. J. Pittet, F. K. Swirski, et al.
Hybrid In Vivo FMT-CT Imaging of Protease Activity in Atherosclerosis With Customized Nanosensors
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, October 1, 2009; 29(10): 1444 - 1451.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
J. H.F. Rudd, M. Elkhawad, and Z. A. Fayad
Vascular Imaging with 18F-FDG PET/CT: Optimal 18F-FDG Circulation Time?
J. Nucl. Med., September 1, 2009; 50(9): 1560 - 1560.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
A. Saraste, S. G. Nekolla, and M. Schwaiger
Cardiovascular molecular imaging: an overview
Cardiovasc Res, September 1, 2009; 83(4): 643 - 652.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ Cardiovasc ImagingHome page
I. Laitinen, A. Saraste, E. Weidl, T. Poethko, A. W. Weber, S. G. Nekolla, P. Leppanen, S. Yla-Herttuala, G. Holzlwimmer, A. Walch, et al.
Evaluation of {alpha}v{beta}3 Integrin-Targeted Positron Emission Tomography Tracer 18F-Galacto-RGD for Imaging of Vascular Inflammation in Atherosclerotic Mice
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging, July 1, 2009; 2(4): 331 - 338.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
J. H.F. Rudd, F. Hyafil, and Z. A. Fayad
Inflammation Imaging in Atherosclerosis
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, July 1, 2009; 29(7): 1009 - 1016.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
L. J. Menezes, C. W. Kotze, B. F. Hutton, R. Endozo, J. C. Dickson, I. Cullum, S. W. Yusuf, P. J. Ell, and A. M. Groves
Vascular Inflammation Imaging with 18F-FDG PET/CT: When to Image?
J. Nucl. Med., June 1, 2009; 50(6): 854 - 857.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
J. Sanz, P. R. Moreno, and V. Fuster
The Year in Atherothrombosis
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 14, 2009; 53(15): 1326 - 1337.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ Cardiovasc ImagingHome page
J. H.F. Rudd, K. S. Myers, S. Bansilal, J. Machac, M. Woodward, V. Fuster, M. E. Farkouh, and Z. A. Fayad
Relationships Among Regional Arterial Inflammation, Calcification, Risk Factors, and Biomarkers: A Prospective Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron-Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Imaging Study
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging, March 1, 2009; 2(2): 107 - 115.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll Cardiol ImgHome page
E. A. Osborn and F. A. Jaffer
The year in molecular imaging.
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Img., January 1, 2009; 2(1): 97 - 113.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ Cardiovasc ImagingHome page
M. Nahrendorf, D. E. Sosnovik, B. A. French, F. K. Swirski, F. Bengel, M. M. Sadeghi, J. R. Lindner, J. C. Wu, D. L. Kraitchman, Z. A. Fayad, et al.
Multimodality Cardiovascular Molecular Imaging, Part II
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging, January 1, 2009; 2(1): 56 - 70.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH RSS TABLE OF CONTENTS
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Copyright © 2008 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine.