HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: jnumed.107.047506v1 49/3/367    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Related articles in JNM Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Peterson, L. M. Articles by Krohn, K. A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Peterson, L. M. Articles by Krohn, K. A.

Quantitative Imaging of Estrogen Receptor Expression in Breast Cancer with PET and ¹⁸F-Fluoroestradiol

¹ Department of Radiology, University of Washington/Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, Washington; ² Department of Pathology, University of Washington/Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, Washington; ³ Phenopath Laboratories, Seattle, Washington; and ⁴ Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa

Correspondence: For correspondence or reprints contact: David A. Mankoff, MD, PhD, Department of Radiology, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, 825 Eastlake Ave. East, Mail Stop 62-600, Seattle, WA 98109. E-mail: dam{at}u.washington.edu

The PET compound ¹⁸F-fluoroestradiol (¹⁸F-FES) has been developed and tested as an agent for the imaging of estrogen receptor (ER) expression in vivo. ¹⁸F-FES uptake has been shown to correlate with ER expression assayed in vitro by radioligand binding; however, immunohistochemistry (IHC) rather than radioligand binding is used most often to measure ER expression in clinical practice. We therefore compared ¹⁸F-FES uptake with ER expression assayed in vitro by IHC with both qualitative and semiquantitative measures. Methods: Seventeen patients with primary or metastatic breast cancer were studied with dynamic ¹⁸F-FES PET; cancer tissue samples, collected close to the time of imaging, were assayed for ER expression by IHC. For each tumor, partial-volume-corrected measures of ¹⁸F-FES uptake were compared with ER expression measured by 3 different ER scoring methods: qualitative scoring (0–3+), the Allred score (0–10), and a computerized IHC index. Results: There was excellent agreement (r = 0.99) between observers using IHC as well as the different methods of measuring ER content (P < 0.001). ER-negative tumors had ¹⁸F-FES partial-volume-corrected standardized uptake values of less than 1.0, whereas ER-positive tumors had values above 1.1. Correlation coefficients for the different measures of ER content and the different measures of ¹⁸F-FES uptake ranged from 0.57 to 0.73, with the best correlation being between the computerized IHC index and ¹⁸F-FES partial-volume-corrected standardized uptake values. Conclusion: Our results showed good agreement between ¹⁸F-FES PET and ER expression measured by IHC. ¹⁸F-FES imaging may be a useful tool for aiding in the assessment of ER status, especially in patients with multiple tumors or for tumors that are difficult to biopsy.

Key Words: estrogen receptor • breast cancer • ¹⁸F-FES PET • IHC • tracer uptake

COPYRIGHT © 2008 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine, Inc.

Related articles in JNM:

This Month in JNM

JNM 2008 49: 11A-12A. [Full Text]  

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. H. Lee, E. L. Rosen, and D. A. Mankoff The Role of Radiotracer Imaging in the Diagnosis and Management of Patients with Breast Cancer: Part 2--Response to Therapy, Other Indications, and Future Directions J. Nucl. Med., May 1, 2009; 50(5): 738 - 748. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. P.S. Dunphy and J. S. Lewis Radiopharmaceuticals in Preclinical and Clinical Development for Monitoring of Therapy with PET J. Nucl. Med., May 1, 2009; 50(Suppl_1): 106S - 121S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. E. Laing, M. A. Walter, D. O. Campbell, H. R. Herschman, N. Satyamurthy, M. E. Phelps, J. Czernin, O. N. Witte, and C. G. Radu Noninvasive prediction of tumor responses to gemcitabine using positron emission tomography PNAS, February 24, 2009; 106(8): 2847 - 2852. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J.-M. Beauregard, E. Croteau, N. Ahmed, J. E. van Lier, and F. Benard Assessment of Human Biodistribution and Dosimetry of 4-Fluoro-11{beta}-Methoxy-16{alpha}-18F-Fluoroestradiol Using Serial Whole-Body PET/CT J. Nucl. Med., January 1, 2009; 50(1): 100 - 107. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. A. Mankoff, J. M. Link, H. M. Linden, L. Sundararajan, and K. A. Krohn Tumor Receptor Imaging J. Nucl. Med., June 1, 2008; 49(Suppl_2): 149S - 163S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]