HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Supplemental Data All Versions of this Article: jnumed.107.045484v1 49/2/216    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Related articles in JNM Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Google Scholar Articles by Taylor, A. Articles by Dubovsky, E. PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Taylor, A. Articles by Dubovsky, E.

Diagnostic Performance of an Expert System for Interpretation of ^99mTc MAG3 Scans in Suspected Renal Obstruction

¹ Department of Radiology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia; ² Department of Biostatistics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia; and ³ Department of Radiology, University of Alabama, Birmingham, Alabama

Correspondence: For correspondence or reprints contact: Andrew Taylor, MD, Division of Nuclear Medicine, Emory University Hospital, 1364 Clifton Rd., NE, Atlanta, GA, 30322. E-mail: ataylor{at}emory.edu

The purpose of the study was to compare diuresis renography scan interpretation generated by a renal expert system with the consensus interpretation of 3 expert readers. Methods: The expert system was evaluated in 95 randomly selected furosemide-augmented patient studies (185 kidneys) obtained for suspected obstruction; there were 55 males and 40 females with a mean age ± SD of 58.6 ± 16.5 y. Each subject had a baseline ^99mTc-mercaptoacetyltriglycine (^99mTc-MAG3) scan followed by furosemide administration and a separate 20-min acquisition. Quantitative parameters were automatically extracted from baseline and furosemide acquisitions and forwarded to the expert system for analysis. Three experts, unaware of clinical information, independently graded each kidney as obstructed/probably obstructed, equivocal, and probably nonobstructed/nonobstructed; experts resolved differences by a consensus reading. These 3 expert categories were compared with the obstructed, equivocal, and nonobstructed interpretations provided by the expert system. Agreement was assessed using weighted , and the predictive accuracy of the expert system compared with expert readers was assessed by the area under receiver-operating-characteristic (ROC curve) curves. Results: The expert system agreed with the consensus reading in 84% (101/120) of nonobstructed kidneys, in 92% (33/36) of obstructed kidneys, and in 45% (13/29) of equivocal kidneys. The weighted between the expert system and the consensus reading was 0.72 and was comparable with the weighted between experts. There was no significant difference in the areas under the ROC curves when the expert system was compared with each expert using the other 2 experts as the gold standard. Conclusion: The renal expert system showed good agreement with the expert interpretation and could be a useful educational and decision support tool to assist physicians in the diagnosis of renal obstruction. To better mirror the clinical setting, algorithms to incorporate clinical data must be designed, implemented, and tested.

Key Words: RENEX • ^99mTc-MAG3 • furosemide • diuresis renogaphy • renal obstruction

COPYRIGHT © 2008 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine, Inc.

Related articles in JNM:

This Month in JNM

JNM 2008 49: 11A-12A. [Full Text]