JNM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


First published online January 16, 2008, 10.2967/jnumed.107.044990
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Data
Right arrow An erratum has been published
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
jnumed.107.044990v1
49/2/179    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in JNM
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fletcher, J. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fletcher, J. W.
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Vol. 49 No. 2 179-185
© 2008 by Society of Nuclear Medicine

doi: 10.2967/jnumed.107.044990

Clinical Investigation

A Comparison of the Diagnostic Accuracy of 18F-FDG PET and CT in the Characterization of Solitary Pulmonary Nodules

James W. Fletcher1, Steven M. Kymes2, Michael Gould3, Naomi Alazraki4, R. Edward Coleman5, Val J. Lowe6, Charles Marn7, George Segall8, Lyn A. Thet9, Kelvin Lee10 and for the VA SNAP Cooperative Studies Group

1 Department of Radiology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana; 2 Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri; 3 Department of Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System and the Department of Medicine, Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford, California; 4 Department of Radiology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia; 5 Department of Radiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina; 6 Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota; 7 Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine, Madison, Wisconsin; 8 Department of Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System and the Department of Radiology, Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford, California; 9 Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine, Madison, Wisconsin; and 10 Department of Veterans Affairs Cooperative Studies Program Coordinating Center, Palo Alto, California

Correspondence: For correspondence or reprints contact: James W. Fletcher, MD, Department of Radiology, Indiana/Purdue University, Indiana University School of Medicine, University Hospital, Room 0655, 550 N. University Blvd., Indianapolis, IN 46202-5253. E-mail: jwfletch{at}iupui.edu

CT and PET are widely used to characterize solitary pulmonary nodules (SPNs). However, most CT accuracy studies have been performed with outdated technology and methods, and previous PET studies have been limited by small sample sizes and incomplete masking. Our objective was to compare CT and PET accuracy in veterans with SPN. Methods: Between January 1999 and June 2001, we recruited 532 participants with SPNs newly diagnosed on radiography and untreated. The SPNs were 7–30 mm. All patients underwent 18F-FDG PET and CT. A masked panel of 3 PET and 3 CT experts rated the studies on a 5-point scale. SPN tissue diagnosis or 2-y follow-up established the final diagnosis. Results: A definitive diagnosis was established for 344 participants. The prevalence of malignancy was 53%. The average size was 16 mm. Likelihood ratios (LRs) for PET and CT results for combined ratings of either definitely benign (33% and 9% of patients, respectively) or probably benign (27% and 12%) were 0.10 and 0.11, respectively. LRs for PET and CT results for combined ratings of indeterminate (1% and 25%), probably malignant (21% and 39%), or definitely malignant (35% and 15%) were 5.18 and 1.61, respectively. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.93 (95% confidence interval, 0.90–0.95) for PET and 0.82 (95% confidence interval, 0.77–0.86) for CT (P < 0.0001 for the difference). PET inter- and intraobserver reliability was superior to CT. Conclusion: Definitely and probably benign results on PET and CT strongly predict benign SPN. However, such results were 3 times more common with PET. Definitely malignant results on PET were much more predictive of malignancy than were these results on CT. A malignant final diagnosis was approximately 10 times more likely than a benign final diagnosis in participants with PET results rated definitely malignant.

Key Words: oncology • PET • respiratory • CT • SPN • diagnosis

COPYRIGHT © 2008 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine, Inc.


Related articles in JNM:

This Month in JNM

JNM 2008 49: 11A-12A. [Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JNMHome page
R. E. Fisher
PET for the Evaluation of Solitary Pulmonary Nodules
J. Nucl. Med., February 1, 2009; 50(2): 326 - 326.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
J. W. Fletcher and for the VA SNAP Cooperative Studies Group
Reply: PET for the Evaluation of Solitary Pulmonary Nodules
J. Nucl. Med., February 1, 2009; 50(2): 326 - 327.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Copyright © 2008 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine.