|
|
|||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Clinical Investigation |
1 Center for Liver Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea; 2 Department of Nuclear Medicine, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea; 3 Center for Cancer Prevention and Detection, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea; and 4 Cancer Registration and Biostatistics Branch, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea
Correspondence: For correspondence or reprints contact: Joong-Won Park, Center for Liver Cancer, National Cancer Center, 809 Madu-dong, Ilsan-gu, Goyang, Gyeonggi-do, 411-769, Republic of Korea. E-mail: jwpark{at}ncc.re.kr
Because 18F-FDG PET has insufficient sensitivity for the detection of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), 11C-acetate PET has been proposed as another technique for this use. We prospectively evaluated the value of PET/CT using these 2 tracers for the detection of primary and metastatic HCC. Methods: One hundred twelve patients (99 with HCC, 13 with cholangiocellular carcinoma) underwent biopsy and 18F-FDG and 11C-acetate PET/CT. Results: The overall sensitivities of 18F-FDG, 11C-acetate, and dual-tracer PET/CT in the detection of 110 lesions in 90 patients with primary HCC were 60.9%, 75.4%, and 82.7%, respectively. Elevated serum
-fetoprotein levels, an advanced tumor stage, portal vein tumor thrombosis, large tumors, and multiple tumors were significantly associated with positive 18F-FDG PET/CT results. Uptake of 11C-acetate was associated with large and multiple tumors. For 18F-FDG, the sensitivities according to tumor size (1–2, 2–5, and
5 cm) were 27.2%, 47.8%, and 92.8%, respectively; for 11C-acetate, these respective values were 31.8%, 78.2%, and 95.2%. 18F-FDG was more sensitive in the detection of poorly differentiated HCC. Overall survival was lower in patients with 18F-FDG PET/CT positive for all indexed lesions than in those with FDG negative or partially positive through the entire follow-up period. In analysis based on biopsied lesions, the sensitivity of 18F-FDG PET/CT was 64.4% for primary HCC and 84.4% for 11C-acetate PET/CT. The overall sensitivities of 18F-FDG, 11C-acetate, and dual-tracer PET/CT for 35 metastatic HCCs were 85.7%, 77.0%, and 85.7%, respectively. There was no significant difference in the sensitivity of tracers according to metastatic tumor size, location, or differentiation. Conclusion: The addition of 11C-acetate to 18F-FDG PET/CT increases the overall sensitivity for the detection of primary HCC but not for the detection of extrahepatic metastases. 18F-FDG, 11C-acetate, and dual-tracer PET/CT have a low sensitivity for the detection of small primary HCC, but 18F-FDG PET/CT has a relatively high sensitivity for the detection of extrahepatic metastases of HCC.
Key Words: hepatology oncology PET/CT FDG acetate hepatocellular carcinoma sensitivity
COPYRIGHT © 2008 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine, Inc.
Related articles in JNM:
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. McKeon, M. Apiwattanakul, D. H. Lachance, V. A. Lennon, J. N. Mandrekar, B. F. Boeve, B. Mullan, B. Mokri, J. W. Britton, D. A. Drubach, et al. Positron Emission Tomography- Computed Tomography in Paraneoplastic Neurologic Disorders: Systematic Analysis and Review Arch Neurol, January 11, 2010; (2010) 2009.336. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. A. Catalano, G. Choy, A. Zhu, P. F. Hahn, and D. V. Sahani Differentiation of Malignant Thrombus from Bland Thrombus of the Portal Vein in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Application of Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging Radiology, January 1, 2010; 254(1): 154 - 162. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Eckel, K. Herrmann, S. Schmidt, C. Hillerer, H. A. Wieder, B.-J. Krause, T. Schuster, R. Langer, H.-J. Wester, R. M. Schmid, et al. Imaging of Proliferation in Hepatocellular Carcinoma with the In Vivo Marker 18F-Fluorothymidine J. Nucl. Med., September 1, 2009; 50(9): 1441 - 1447. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Y. Lee and K. C. P. Li Systems Diagnostics: The Systems Approach to Molecular Imaging Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2009; 193(2): 287 - 294. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | RSS | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY | THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE |