JNM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

First published online December 12, 2007, 10.2967/jnumed.107.044313
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
jnumed.107.044313v1
49/1/88    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in JNM
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Goetz, C.
Right arrow Articles by Constantinesco, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Goetz, C.
Right arrow Articles by Constantinesco, A.
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Vol. 49 No. 1 88-93
© 2008 by Society of Nuclear Medicine
doi: 10.2967/jnumed.107.044313

Basic Science Investigation

SPECT Low-Field MRI System for Small-Animal Imaging

Christian Goetz1, Elodie Breton1, Philippe Choquet1, Vincent Israel-Jost2 and André Constantinesco1

1 Service de Biophysique et Médecine Nucléaire, Hôpital de Hautepierre, Strasbourg, France; and 2 ENST GET/TSI, Paris, France

Correspondence: For correspondence or reprints contact: André Constantinesco, MD, PhD, Service de Biophysique et Médecine Nucléaire, CHU Hautepierre, 1 av. Molière, 67098, Strasbourg, France. E-mail: andre.constantinesco{at}chru-strasbourg.fr

Localization of regions with increased uptake of radiotracer in small-animal SPECT is greatly facilitated when using coregistration with anatomic images of the same animal. As MRI has several advantages compared with CT (soft-tissue contrast and lack of ionizing radiation) we developed a SPECT/low-field MRI hybrid device for small-animal imaging. Methods: A small-animal single-pinhole {gamma}-camera (pinhole, 1.5 mm in diameter and 12 cm in focal length) adjacent to a dedicated low-field (0.1 T) small MR imager (imaging volume, 10 x 10 x 6 cm3) was used. The animal was placed in a warmed nonmagnetic polymethyl methacrylate imaging cell for MR acquisition, which was followed immediately by SPECT after translation of the imaging cell from one modality to the other. 3-Dimensional T1-weighted sequences were used for MRI. Phantom studies enabled verification of a low attenuation (10%) for 99mTc and 201Tl and a very slight increase in Compton scattering due to the radiofrequency coil and polymethyl methacrylate imaging cell. Results: SPECT/MRI data acquisition and image coregistration of selected examples using different radiotracers for lungs, kidneys, and brain were obtained in 3 nude mice with isotropic spatial resolutions of 0.5 x 0.5 x 0.5 mm3 for MRI and 1 x 1 x 1 mm3 for SPECT. The total acquisition time for combined SPECT and MRI lasted 1 h 45 min. Conclusion: A low-magnetic-field strength of 0.1 T is a simple and useful solution for a small-animal dual-imaging device combining pinhole SPECT with the adjacent MR imager.

Key Words: small animals • dual modality • SPECT • MRI • molecular imaging

COPYRIGHT © 2008 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine, Inc.


Related articles in JNM:

This Month in JNM

JNM 2008 49: 11A-12A. [Full Text]  





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Copyright © 2008 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine.