|
|
|||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Continuing Education |
Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, California; and Department of Radiology, Kaiser Permanente Woodland Hills Medical Center, Woodland Hills, California
Correspondence: For correspondence or reprints contact: Wei Chen, MD, PhD, CHS, AR-144, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA 90095. E-mail: weichen{at}mednet.ucla.edu
Malignant gliomas and metastatic tumors are the most common brain tumors. Neuroimaging plays a significant role clinically. In low-grade tumors, neuroimaging is needed to evaluate recurrent disease and to monitor anaplastic transformation into high-grade tumors. In high-grade and metastatic tumors, the imaging challenge is to distinguish between recurrent tumor and treatment-induced changes such as radiation necrosis. The current clinical gold standard, MRI, provides superior structural detail but poor specificity in identifying viable tumors in brain treated with surgery, radiation, or chemotherapy. 18F-FDG PET identifies anaplastic transformation and has prognostic value. The sensitivity and specificity of 18F-FDG in evaluating recurrent tumor and treatment-induced changes can be improved significantly by coregistration with MRI and potentially by delayed imaging 3–8 h after injection. Amino acid PET tracers are more sensitive than 18F-FDG in imaging recurrent tumors and in particular recurrent low-grade tumors. They are also promising in differentiating between recurrent tumors and treatment-induced changes.
Key Words: neurology oncology PET brain tumors
Guest Editor: H. William Strauss, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center
* NOTE: FOR CE CREDIT, YOU CAN ACCESS THIS ACTIVITY THROUGH THE SNM WEB SITE (http://www.snm.org/ce_online) THROUGH SEPTEMBER 2008.
No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.
COPYRIGHT © 2007 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine, Inc.
Related articles in JNM:
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
E. C. Ford, J. Herman, E. Yorke, and R. L. Wahl 18F-FDG PET/CT for Image-Guided and Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy J. Nucl. Med., October 1, 2009; 50(10): 1655 - 1665. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Y. Wen and S. Kesari Malignant Gliomas in Adults N. Engl. J. Med., July 31, 2008; 359(5): 492 - 507. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. A. Brandes, A. Tosoni, F. Spagnolli, G. Frezza, M. Leonardi, F. Calbucci, and E. Franceschi Disease progression or pseudoprogression after concomitant radiochemotherapy treatment: Pitfalls in neurooncology Neuro Oncology, June 1, 2008; 10(3): 361 - 367. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Terakawa, N. Tsuyuguchi, Y. Iwai, K. Yamanaka, S. Higashiyama, T. Takami, and K. Ohata Diagnostic Accuracy of 11C-Methionine PET for Differentiation of Recurrent Brain Tumors from Radiation Necrosis After Radiotherapy J. Nucl. Med., May 1, 2008; 49(5): 694 - 699. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | RSS | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY | THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE |