HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: jnumed.107.041350v1 48/8/1237    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Related articles in JNM Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Jeong, H.-S. Articles by Baek, C.-H. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Jeong, H.-S. Articles by Baek, C.-H.

Role of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT in Management of High-Grade Salivary Gland Malignancies

¹ Department of Otorhinolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; ² Department of Nuclear Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; ³ Department of Radiology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; and ⁴ Department of Pathology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea

Correspondence: For correspondence or reprints contact: Chung-Hwan Baek, MD, PhD, Department of Otorhinolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 50 Ilwon-dong, Gangnam-gu, 135-710, Seoul, Korea. E-mail: chbaek{at}smc.samsung.co.kr

The role of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT for planning the treatment of high-grade salivary gland malignancies was investigated and was compared with that with using contrast-enhanced CT. Methods: The subjects chosen for the study had high-grade cancer of the salivary gland, as confirmed by surgical pathology. The diagnostic values from 37 CT and PET/CT scans of 33 subjects were compared. The ability to predict the extent of the disease was compared by performing a subsite-based analysis for the primary lesions and a level-by-level analysis for the neck node levels as well as for the final TNM staging. The surgical pathology (67.6%) and clinical follow-up examinations (32.4%) were used as the reference standards. Furthermore, the changes made in each subject's care, based on a PET/CT examination, were compared with the treatment received without using the PET/CT data. Results: Using a primary subsite-based analysis, the diagnostic accuracy for predicting the pathologic tumor extent was significantly higher for PET/CT (91.0%) compared with that using CT alone (70.1%, P < 0.001). For the neck nodes on a level-by-level analysis, the metastasis could be predicted more accurately on the basis of a PET/CT examination (97.6%) than with using only CT (86.0%, P = 0.01). PET/CT was also far superior to CT in terms of the TNM staging (83.7% vs. 62.1%, P = 0.03). For 43.2% of the subjects, changes in the clinical decision making were made as a result of the PET/CT scan data over what was previously determined by using the CT scans alone. Conclusion: PET/CT provides more accurate diagnostic information for the evaluation of high-grade salivary cancer than does CT and it has a major impact on making treatment decisions for patients with a high-grade salivary malignancy.

Key Words: ¹⁸F-FDG • PET/CT • CT scans • salivary gland cancers • treatment

^* Contributed equally to this work.

COPYRIGHT © 2007 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine, Inc.

Related articles in JNM:

This Month in JNM

JNM 2007 48: 11a-12a. [Full Text]