HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH RSS TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: jnumed.107.040253v1 48/8/1230    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Related articles in JNM Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Keidar, Z. Articles by Nitecki, S. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Keidar, Z. Articles by Nitecki, S.

Prosthetic Vascular Graft Infection: The Role of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT

¹ Department of Nuclear Medicine, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel; ² B. Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion–Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel; ³ Department of Radiology, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel; and ⁴ Department of Vascular Surgery, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel

Correspondence: For correspondence or reprints contact: Zohar Keidar, MD, PhD, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Rambam Health Care Campus, Bat-Galim, Haifa, Israel 35254. E-mail: zohar{at}keidar.net

Graft infection after prosthetic vascular reconstruction is an uncommon but severe complication. The clinical presentation is often subtle and nonspecific and may occur long after surgery. Although defining a prosthetic vascular graft infection can be difficult, early diagnosis and treatment are important because of the relatively high rates of amputation and death. The present study assessed the role of PET/CT using ¹⁸F-FDG for the diagnosis of vascular graft infections. Methods: Thirty-nine patients (35 men and 4 women; age range, 44–82 y) with suspected vascular graft infection underwent ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT. The performance of PET/CT for the diagnosis of an infectious process and its localization to the graft or soft tissues was assessed. The final diagnosis was based on histopathologic findings and microbiologic assays obtained at surgery or on clinical and imaging follow-up. Results: PET/CT detected foci of increased ¹⁸F-FDG uptake suspected as infection in 27 patients and localized these findings to the graft in 16 patients. Vascular graft infection was confirmed in 14 of these patients (88%). PET/CT excluded graft involvement in 11 patients, and in 10 (91%) of these 11, long-term follow-up further confirmed that the infectious process was limited to surrounding soft tissues only. No abnormal ¹⁸F-FDG uptake was found in any of the 12 patients with no further evidence of infection. PET/CT had a sensitivity of 93%, specificity of 91%, positive predictive value of 88%, and negative predictive value of 96% for the diagnosis of vascular graft infection. Conclusion: ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT is a reliable noninvasive imaging modality for the diagnosis of vascular graft–related infection. The precise anatomic localization of increased ¹⁸F-FDG uptake provided by PET/CT enables accurate differentiation between graft and soft-tissue infection.

Key Words: PET/CT • infection • prosthetic vascular graft

COPYRIGHT © 2007 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine, Inc.

Related articles in JNM:

This Month in JNM

JNM 2007 48: 11a-12a. [Full Text]  

This article has been cited by other articles:

				Z. Keidar, A. Gurman-Balbir, D. Gaitini, and O. Israel Fever of Unknown Origin: The Role of 18F-FDG PET/CT J. Nucl. Med., December 1, 2008; 49(12): 1980 - 1985. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Wasselius, J. Malmstedt, B. Kalin, S. Larsson, A. Sundin, U. Hedin, and H. Jacobsson High 18F-FDG Uptake in Synthetic Aortic Vascular Grafts on PET/CT in Symptomatic and Asymptomatic Patients J. Nucl. Med., October 1, 2008; 49(10): 1601 - 1605. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]