JNM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH RSS TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


First published online June 15, 2007, 10.2967/jnumed.106.038505
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
jnumed.106.038505v1
48/7/1190    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in JNM
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pozzi, O. R.
Right arrow Articles by Zalutsky, M. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pozzi, O. R.
Right arrow Articles by Zalutsky, M. R.
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Vol. 48 No. 7 1190-1196
© 2007 by Society of Nuclear Medicine

doi: 10.2967/jnumed.106.038505

Basic Science Investigation

Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry of Targeted Radiotherapeutics, Part 3: {alpha}-Particle–Induced Radiolytic Effects on the Chemical Behavior of 211At

Oscar R. Pozzi and Michael R. Zalutsky

Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina

Correspondence: For correspondence or reprints contact: Michael R. Zalutsky, PhD, Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Box 3808, Durham, NC 27710. E-mail: zalut001{at}mc.duke.edu

Two characteristics of {alpha}-particles that enhance their potential for targeted radiotherapy are their high energy and approximately cellular range. Unfortunately, these properties also can have negative consequences, confounding the production of clinically relevant levels of radiopharmaceutical because of radiolytic effects. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of radiation dose on the astatine species present before initiation of a labeling reaction and the potential role of these molecules in the efficiency of N-succinimidyl 3-211At-astatobenzoate (SAB) synthesis. The ranges of radiation dose evaluated were selected to reflect those that might be encountered in SAB synthesis for the preparation of clinical doses of 211At-labeled radiopharmaceuticals. Methods: The distribution of astatine species present in methanol, and the yields for the synthesis of SAB from N-succinimidyl 3-(tri-n-butylstannyl)benzoate as a function of radiation dose, were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography. Radiation doses in the range of 500–12,000 Gy were evaluated using different 211At time–activity combinations, and the effect of acetic acid, a normal component of astatodestannylation reactions, also was studied. Finally, the effect of the reducing agent sodium sulfite also was evaluated to characterize the nature of the species produced by radiolysis. Results: At radiation doses below 1,000 Gy, high-performance liquid chromatography analysis indicated that more than 90% of the 211At was present in methanol as a single species, At(1), whereas at higher doses, a second peak, At(2), emerged. At(1) decreased and At(2) increased in a radiation dose–dependent fashion, with At(2) becoming the predominant species at about 3,000 Gy. At(2) was identified as a reduced form of astatine, presumably astatide, which could not be efficiently oxidized to a species suitable for electrophilic astatination. In methanol/acetic acid, more than 95% of the astatine was present as At(2) even at doses below 1,400 Gy. Conclusion: The emergence of a reduced form of astatine, At(2), at higher radiation doses is consistent with the decline in SAB yields observed under these conditions. Alteration of the chemical form of the astatine by radiolysis could account for the declining yields noted in the preparation of clinical-level 211At-labeled radiopharmaceuticals and when the labeling chemistry is initiated hours after 211At production.

Key Words: 211At • {alpha}-particles • radionuclide therapy • radiolysis

COPYRIGHT © 2007 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine, Inc.


Related articles in JNM:

This Month in JNM

JNM 2007 48: 11a-12a. [Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JNMHome page
S. Lindegren, S. Frost, T. Back, E. Haglund, J. Elgqvist, and H. Jensen
Direct Procedure for the Production of 211At-Labeled Antibodies with an {varepsilon}-Lysyl-3-(Trimethylstannyl)Benzamide Immunoconjugate
J. Nucl. Med., September 1, 2008; 49(9): 1537 - 1545.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH RSS TABLE OF CONTENTS
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Copyright © 2007 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine.