JNM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in JNM
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nahmias, C.
Right arrow Articles by Townsend, D. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nahmias, C.
Right arrow Articles by Townsend, D. W.
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Vol. 48 No. 5 744-751
© 2007 by Society of Nuclear Medicine

doi: 10.2967/jnumed.106.038513

Clinical Investigation

Time Course of Early Response to Chemotherapy in Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients with 18F-FDG PET/CT

Claude Nahmias1, Wahid T. Hanna1, Lindi M. Wahl2, Misty J. Long1, Karl F. Hubner1 and David W. Townsend1

1 Departments of Medicine and Radiology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee; and 2 Department of Applied Mathematics, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada

Correspondence: For correspondence or reprints contact: Claude Nahmias, PhD, Molecular Imaging and Tracer Development Program, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tennessee, 1924 Alcoa Hwy., Box 93, Knoxville, TN 37920-6999. E-mail: CNahmias{at}mc.utmck.edu

PET and 18F-FDG have the potential to follow the early metabolic response to chemotherapy in patients with non–small cell lung cancer and to predict success or failure of the therapy. Methods: We studied 16 patients with non–small cell lung cancer as they followed 2 courses of docetaxel and carboplatin. Each patient was studied weekly for 7 wk, and tissue activity was assessed by the amount of radioactivity retained 90 min after the intravenous injection of 18F-FDG. In a prospective analysis, the linear least-squares method was used to evaluate the time course of metabolic activity in tumor and liver, bone marrow, and unaffected lung tissues; a metabolic response was defined as a response in which the slope of the regression was negative and significantly different from zero. Our hypothesis was that patients who exhibited a tumor metabolic response would survive longer than those who did not. In a retrospective examination of our data, we grouped our patients into those who survived <6 mo and those who survived longer and calculated the difference in the standardized uptake value (SUV) between day 7 and subsequent time points to determine the most appropriate timing of 2 PET studies in predicting response to therapy. Results: Fifteen of 16 patients completed the study. In the prospective study, 8 patients were classified as nonresponders as the slope of the regression of tumor SUV versus time was not different from zero; they all died within 35 wk of the end of their study. Seven patients were classified as responders; 5 survived and 2 died, one at 25 wk and the other at 76 wk. In the retrospective study, a decrease of 0.5 SUV between studies performed at 1 and 3 wk after the initiation of chemotherapy was predictive of those patients who survived >6 mo and in whom chemotherapy was presumably successful. Conclusion: Patients with non–small cell lung cancer who had a positive outcome, as exhibited by prolonged survival, were those who showed a tumor metabolic response assessed using weekly 18F-FDG PET studies. 18F-FDG PET studies performed at 1 and 3 wk after the initiation of chemotherapy allowed prediction of the response to therapy.

Key Words: 18F-FDG • PET • non–small cell lung cancer • treatment monitoring

COPYRIGHT © 2007 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine, Inc.


Related articles in JNM:

This Month in JNM

JNM 2007 48: 11a-12a. [Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JCOHome page
J. V. Frangioni
New Technologies for Human Cancer Imaging
J. Clin. Oncol., August 20, 2008; 26(24): 4012 - 4021.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Copyright © 2007 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine.