JNM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ziessman, H. A.
Right arrow Articles by Ravich, W. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ziessman, H. A.
Right arrow Articles by Ravich, W. J.
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Vol. 48 No. 4 568-572
© 2007 by Society of Nuclear Medicine

doi: 10.2967/jnumed.106.036616

Clinical Investigation

Experience with a Simplified, Standardized 4-Hour Gastric-Emptying Protocol

Harvey A. Ziessman1, Dacian V. Bonta1, Sibyll Goetze1 and William J. Ravich2

1 Division of Nuclear Medicine, Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland; and 2 Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland

Correspondence: For correspondence or reprints contact: Harvey A. Ziessman, MD, Johns Hopkins Outpatient Center, 601 N. Caroline St., Suite 3231, Baltimore, MD 21278. E-mail: hziessm1{at}jhmi.edu

Gastric-emptying studies have no accepted standard methodology or reference values. A simplified standardized protocol with a large reference database has been proposed, with imaging obtained at only 0, 1, 2, and 4 h. The rationale for its 4-h length is data suggesting that delayed emptying is detected with higher sensitivity at 4 h than at 2 h. The purpose of the current investigation was to review our 2-y experience using this protocol, to determine the added value of 4-h imaging, and to determine whether the lag phase can predict delayed emptying. Methods: After ingesting a sandwich made with 99mTc-sulfur colloid egg substitute, 175 patients were imaged immediately, every 10 min for 1 h, and then at 2, 3, and 4 h. Percentage retention was calculated for each interval. Sensitivities, specificities, predictive values, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were computed for the 1-, 2-, and 3-h intervals on the basis of normal 4-h values. Data were analyzed to determine the added value of the 4-h study. Thresholds were sought that optimized accuracy. ROC analysis was used to determine the predictive value of the lag phase. Results: Gastric emptying was delayed in 20% of patients at 2 h and in 26% at 4 h, a 29% increase in abnormal studies (P < 0.02). Of those normal at 2 h, 13% became abnormal at 4 h. Of those with delayed emptying at 2 h, 24% normalized at 4 h. Compared with the study at 4 h, the study at 2 h had a 59% sensitivity, 94% specificity, 76% PPV, and 87% NPV. ROC analysis showed that the areas under the ROC curve (AUC) were 0.75, 0.93, and 0.97 at 1, 2, and 3 h, respectively. The threshold for optimal accuracy for 3-h data was estimated to be greater than 30% retention. The accuracy of this threshold was 91%. The lag phase AUC for predicting delayed emptying at 4 h was 0.60. Conclusion: This first investigation of a large referral patient population using a standardized protocol found that abnormal emptying is detected with greater sensitivity at 4 h than at 2 h and that the lag phase is not predictive of delayed emptying.

Key Words: gastric emptying • lag phase • stomach • gastroparesis • standardization

COPYRIGHT © 2007 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine, Inc.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JNMHome page
H. A. Ziessman, A. Chander, J. O. Clarke, A. Ramos, and R. L.Wahl
The Added Diagnostic Value of Liquid Gastric Emptying Compared with Solid Emptying Alone
J. Nucl. Med., May 1, 2009; 50(5): 726 - 731.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nucl. Med. Technol.Home page
W. C. Klingensmith III and S. P. Lawrence
The Gastric Emptying Study: Protocol Design Considerations
J. Nucl. Med. Technol., December 1, 2008; 36(4): 195 - 199.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nucl. Med. Technol.Home page
T. L. Abell, M. Camilleri, K. Donohoe, W. L. Hasler, H. C. Lin, A. H. Maurer, R. W. McCallum, T. Nowak, M. L. Nusynowitz, H. P. Parkman, et al.
Consensus Recommendations for Gastric Emptying Scintigraphy: A Joint Report of the American Neurogastroenterology and Motility Society and the Society of Nuclear Medicine
J. Nucl. Med. Technol., March 1, 2008; 36(1): 44 - 54.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Copyright © 2007 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine.