|
|
|||||||||
Basic Science Investigation |
1 The Molecular Imaging Program at Stanford (MIPS), Department of Radiology and Bio-X Program, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California; 2 Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California; 3 Immunopharmacology and Targeted Therapy Laboratory, Department of Experimental Therapeutics, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; and 4 Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
Correspondence: For correspondence or reprints contact: Xiaoyuan (Shawn) Chen, PhD, The Molecular Imaging Program at Stanford (MIPS), Department of Radiology and Bio-X Program, Stanford University School of Medicine, 1201 Welch Rd., P095, Stanford, CA 94305-5484. E-mail: shawchen{at}stanford.edu
Vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGF-A) and its receptors, Flt-1/FLT-1 (VEGFR-1) and Flk-1/KDR (VEGFR-2), are key regulators of tumor angiogenesis and tumor growth. The purpose of this study was to determine the antiangiogenic and antitumor efficacies of a vasculature-targeting fusion toxin (VEGF121/rGel) composed of the VEGF-A isoform VEGF121 linked with a G4S tether to recombinant plant toxin gelonin (rGel) in an orthotopic glioblastoma mouse model by use of noninvasive in vivo bioluminescence imaging (BLI), MRI, and PET. Methods: Tumor-bearing mice were randomized into 2 groups and balanced according to BLI and MRI signals. PET with 64Cu-1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododedane-N,N',N'',N'''-tetraacetic acid (DOTA)-VEGF121/rGel was performed before VEGF121/rGel treatment. 18F-Fluorothymidine (18F-FLT) scans were obtained before and after treatment to evaluate VEGF121/rGel therapeutic efficacy. In vivo results were confirmed with ex vivo histologic and immunohistochemical analyses. Results: Logarithmic transformation of peak BLI tumor signal intensity revealed a strong correlation with MRI tumor volume (r = 0.89, n = 14). PET with 64Cu-DOTA-VEGF121/rGel before treatment revealed a tumor accumulation (mean ± SD) of 11.8 ± 2.3 percentage injected dose per gram at 18 h after injection, and the receptor specificity of the tumor accumulation was confirmed by successful blocking of the uptake in the presence of an excess amount of VEGF121. PET with 18F-FLT revealed significant a decrease in tumor proliferation in VEGF121/rGel-treated mice compared with control mice. Histologic analysis revealed specific tumor neovasculature damage after treatment with 4 doses of VEGF121/rGel; this damage was accompanied by a significant decrease in peak BLI tumor signal intensity. Conclusion: The results of this study suggest that future clinical multimodality imaging and therapy with VEGF121/rGel may provide an effective means to prospectively identify patients who will benefit from VEGF121/rGel therapy and then stratify, personalize, and monitor treatment to obtain optimal survival outcomes.
Key Words: glioblastoma multiforme VEGFR-2 (Flk-1/KDR) gelonin VEGF121 angiogenesis
* Contributed equally to this work.
Related articles in JNM:
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
B. Turkbey, H. Kobayashi, M. Ogawa, M. Bernardo, and P. L. Choyke Imaging of Tumor Angiogenesis: Functional or Targeted? Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2009; 193(2): 304 - 313. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Zhao, E. Richer, P. P. Antich, and R. P. Mason Antivascular effects of combretastatin A4 phosphate in breast cancer xenograft assessed using dynamic bioluminescence imaging and confirmed by MRI FASEB J, July 1, 2008; 22(7): 2445 - 2451. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Cai and X. Chen Multimodality Molecular Imaging of Tumor Angiogenesis J. Nucl. Med., June 1, 2008; 49(Suppl_2): 113S - 128S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. S. Bradbury, D. Hambardzumyan, P. B. Zanzonico, J. Schwartz, S. Cai, E. M. Burnazi, V. Longo, S. M. Larson, and E. C. Holland Dynamic Small-Animal PET Imaging of Tumor Proliferation with 3'-Deoxy-3'-18F-Fluorothymidine in a Genetically Engineered Mouse Model of High-Grade Gliomas J. Nucl. Med., March 1, 2008; 49(3): 422 - 429. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | RSS | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY | THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE |